ReviewSexual and reproductive health matters2023
Opening a portal to pleasure based sexual and reproductive health around the globe; a qualitative analysis and best practice development study.
Review in Sexual and reproductive health matters, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Scaling pleasure-based sexual and reproductive health: an impact and economic modelling study in 99 low- and middle-income countries.BMJ global health · 2026Article
- Rethinking sexual pleasure in research, health care and society.Nature reviews. Urology · 2026Review
- Unmet needs and new challenges in young women's sexual and reproductive health and rights: a qualitative study in Chile's Metropolitan Region.Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2025Article
- Finding the cosmos of intimacies: where pleasurable safe sex dances with liberation.Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedCorrection.2023
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pleasure is often left out of sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) interventions. The expanding evidence base suggests that the inclusion of pleasure can improve SRHR outcomes and increase safer sex practices. However, there is a lack of research into how to include pleasure in applied SRHR work, particularly outside of key groups. This study aims to present the experiences of a cohort of pleasure implementers and develop a series of implementation best practices. Data were gathered from a structured survey filled out by pleasure implementers (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.