Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38037691›Full record

Trial reportNeuro-oncology2024

Survival, neurocognitive function, and health-related quality of life outcomes after rituximab-methotrexate, BCNU, teniposide, and prednisolone for primary CNS lymphoma: Final results of the HOVON 105/ALLG NHL 24 study.

Jacoline E C Bromberg, Samar Issa, Bronno van der Holt, Matthijs van der Meulen, Linda Dirven, Monique C Minnema, Tatjana Seute, Marc Durian, Gavin Cull, Marjolein W M van der Poel and 10 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neuro-oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Methodology of analysis of cognitive impairment in longitudinal randomized clinical trials in oncology: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 15 institutions in 3 countries.

Jacoline E C BrombergDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3830-7142
Samar IssaDepartment of Hematology, Middlemore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0009-0008-2534-3428
Bronno van der HoltHOVON Foundation, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6414-2671
Matthijs van der MeulenDepartment of Neurology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2251-9933
Linda DirvenDepartment of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9157-9895
Monique C MinnemaDepartment of Hematology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3139-8379
Tatjana SeuteDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3668-6177
Marc DurianDepartment of Hematology, ETZ Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Gavin CullSir Charles Gairdner Hospital and PathWest Laboratory Medicine, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2211-3164
Marjolein W M van der PoelDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1305-4150
Wendy B C StevensDepartment of Hematology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3841-9280
Josee M ZijlstraDepartment of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, VUMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Dieta BrandsmaDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7998-9904
Marcel NijlandDepartment of Hematology, UMCG, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2740-2873
Kylie D MasonDepartment of Hematology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6238-4092
Aart BeekerDepartment of Hematology, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4133-769X
Martine C J Abrahamse-TestrooteHOVON Foundation, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1574-489X
Martin J van den BentDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5710-5127
Daphne de JongDepartment of Pathology and HOVON Pathology, Facility and Biobank, Amsterdam UMC, VUMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9725-4060
Jeanette K DoorduijnDepartment of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1014-0918
Erasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLHovon · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLDialyse Centrum Groningen · NLElisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLMaastricht University · NLMedisch Spectrum Twente · NLMiddlemore Hospital · NZRadboud University Nijmegen · NLSpaarne Gasthuis · NLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUThe University of Western Australia · AU

Funding

Dutch Cancer Society KS 4589RocheStichting STOPhersentumoren
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies on the efficacy of rituximab in primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) reported conflicting results. Our international randomized phase 3 study showed that the addition of rituximab to high-dose methotrexate, BCNU, teniposide, and prednisolone (MBVP) in PCNSL was not efficacious in the short term. Here we present long-term results after a median follow-up of 82.3 months.

methodsOne hundred and ninety-nine eligible newly diagnosed, nonimmunocompromised patients with PCNSL aged 18-70 years with WHO performance status 0-3 was randomized between treatment with MBVP chemotherapy with or without rituximab, followed by high-dose cytarabine consolidation in responding patients, and reduced-dose WBRT in patients aged ≤ 60 years. Event-free survival was the primary endpoint. Overall survival rate, neurocognitive functioning (NCF), and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were additionally assessed, with the IPCG test battery, EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BN20 questionnaires, respectively.

resultsFor event-free survival, the hazard ratio was 0.85, 95% CI 0.61-1.18, P = .33. Overall survival rate at 5 years for MBVP and R-MBVP was 49% (39-59) and 53% (43-63) respectively. In total, 64 patients died in the MBVP arm and 55 in the R-MBVP arm, of which 69% were due to PCNSL. At the group level, all domains of NCF and HRQoL improved to a clinically relevant extent after treatment initiation, and remained stable thereafter up to 60 months of follow-up, except for motor speed which deteriorated between 24 and 60 months. Although fatigue improved initially, high levels persisted in the long term.

conclusionsLong-term follow-up confirms the lack of added value of rituximab in addition to MBVP and HD-cytarabine for PCNSL.

Indexed as

Central Nervous System NeoplasmsLymphomaAdolescentAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarmustineCytarabineHumansMethotrexateMiddle AgedPrednisoloneQuality of LifeRituximabTeniposideYoung AdultCarmustineCytarabineMethotrexatePrednisoloneRituximabTeniposidehealth-related quality of lifeneurocognitive functionPCNSLrituximabtreatment

Identifiers

PMID38037691
PMCPMC10995504
OpenAlexW4389219234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.