Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38037600›Full record

ArticleICMI '21 companion : companion publication of the 2021 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction : October 18th-22, 2021, Montreal, Canada. ICMI (Conference) (23rd : 2021 : Montreal, Quebec; Online)2021

Computational Measurement of Motor Imitation and Imitative Learning Differences in Autism Spectrum Disorder: Computational Motor Imitation Measurement in ASD.

Casey J Zampella, Evangelos Sariyanidi, Anne G Hutchinson, G Keith Bartley, Robert T Schultz, Birkan Tunç

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ICMI '21 companion : companion publication of the 2021 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction : October 18th-22, 2021, Montreal, Canada. ICMI (Conference) (23rd : 2021 : Montreal, Quebec; Online), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Head Movement Patterns during Face-to-Face Conversations Vary with Age.ICMI'22 Companion : companion publication of the 2022 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction : November 7-11, 2022, Bangalore, India. ICMI (Conference) (2022 : Bangalore, India) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Casey J ZampellaChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia.
Evangelos SariyanidiChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia.
Anne G HutchinsonChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia.
G Keith BartleyChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia.
Robert T SchultzChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania.
Birkan TunçChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania.
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · US

Funding

A computer vision toolbox for computational analysis of nonverbal social communicationR01MH122599 · NIMH · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI Birkan Tunc · 2020 to 2026
$4.5M
Predicting Autism and Social Functioning from Computer Vision Analyses of Motor Synchrony During Dyadic InteractionsR01MH118327 · NIMH · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI SCHULTZ, ROBERT THOMAS · 2019 to 2023
$3.7M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH118327NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH122599
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motor imitation is a critical developmental skill area that has been strongly and specifically linked to autism spectrum disorder (ASD). However, methodological variability across studies has precluded a clear understanding of the extent and impact of imitation differences in ASD, underscoring a need for more automated, granular measurement approaches that offer greater precision and consistency. In this paper, we investigate the utility of a novel motor imitation measurement approach for accurately differentiating between youth with ASD and typically developing (TD) youth. Findings indicate that youth with ASD imitate body movements significantly differently from TD youth upon repeated administration of a brief, simple task, and that a classifier based on body coordination features derived from this task can differentiate between autistic and TD youth with 82% accuracy. Our method illustrates that group differences are driven not only by interpersonal coordination with the imitated video stimulus, but also by intrapersonal coordination. Comparison of 2D and 3D tracking shows that both approaches achieve the same classification accuracy of 82%, which is highly promising with regard to scalability for larger samples and a range of non-laboratory settings. This work adds to a rapidly growing literature highlighting the promise of computational behavior analysis for detecting and characterizing motor differences in ASD and identifying potential motor biomarkers.

Indexed as

AutismBody joint trackingBody movementComputational behavior analysisInterpersonal coordinationIntrapersonal coordinationMotor imitation

Identifiers

PMID38037600
PMCPMC10687771
OpenAlexW4200111763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.