Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38037547›Full record

GuidelineJournal of gynecologic oncology2024

Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2022 guidelines for uterine cervical neoplasm treatment.

Manabu Seino, Satoru Nagase, Hideki Tokunaga, Wataru Yamagami, Yoichi Kobayashi, Tsutomu Tabata, Masanori Kaneuchi, Yasuyuki Hirashima, Hitoshi Niikura, Kiyoshi Yoshino and 4 more

Abstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Manabu SeinoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University, Yamagata, Japan. m-seino@med.id.yamagata-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-7511-5190
Satoru NagaseDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University, Yamagata, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5212-1128
Hideki TokunagaDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1622-3810
Wataru YamagamiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3925-6057
Yoichi KobayashiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyorin University, Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8474-0625
Tsutomu TabataDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0243-8180
Masanori KaneuchiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Otaru General Hospital, Hokkaido, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2479-1164
Yasuyuki HirashimaDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0269-9313
Hitoshi NiikuraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Hospital Organization Sendai Medical Center, Sendai, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2769-3922
Kiyoshi YoshinoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5732-5215
Kazuhiro TakeharaDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8808-3338
Tsukasa BabaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Iwate Medical University School of Medicine, Shiwa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0066-3747
Hidetaka KatabuchiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2403-6134
Mikio MikamiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokai University, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7496-3518

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology (JSGO) Guidelines 2022 for the Treatment of Uterine Cervical Cancer are revised from the 2017 guideline. This guideline aimed to provide standard care for cervical cancer, indicate appropriate current treatment methods for cervical cancer, minimize variances in treatment methods among institutions, improve disease prognosis and treatment safety, reduce the economic and psychosomatic burden of patients by promoting the performance of appropriate treatment, and enhance mutual understanding between patients and healthcare professionals. The guidelines were prepared through the consensus of the JSGO Guideline Committee, based on a careful review of evidence gathered through the literature searches and the medical health insurance system and actual clinical practice situations in Japan. The guidelines comprise seven chapters and 5 algorithms. The main features of the 2022 revision are as follows: 1) added discussed points at the final consensus meeting; 2) revised the treatment methods based on the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2018 staging system; 3) examined minimally invasive surgery based on Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer trial; 4) added clinical question (CQ) for treatments of rare histological types, gastric type, and small-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma; 5) added CQ for intensity-modulated radiation therapy; 6) added CQ for cancer genomic profiling test; and 7) added CQ for cancer survivorship. Each recommendation is accompanied by a classification of recommendation categories based on the consensus reached by the Guideline Committee members. Here, we present the English version of the JSGO Guidelines 2022 for the Treatment of Uterine Cervical Cancer.

Indexed as

Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsFemaleHumansJapanNeoplasm StagingPregnancyPrognosisSocieties, MedicalClinical Practice GuidelineGuideline, JapanUterine Cervical CancerUterine Cervical Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID38037547
PMCPMC10792216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.