SynthesisJournal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions2023
Bone Quality in Competitive Athletes: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative Diagnostic Performance of Cone Beam Computed Tomography and Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry for Low Bone Density Assessment. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2026Pooled it
- Sport-Specific Impact Loading is Associated with Bone Mineral Density in Athletes: Implications for Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (REDs) Assessment.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Impact of Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (REDs) on Bone Health in Elite Athletes: A Retrospective Analysis.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2025Article
- Two-year Skeletal Adaptations in Development and National Level Female Figure Skaters.International journal of exercise science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study objective was to assess bone quality measured by high resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) in competitive athletes. Medline, EMBASE and Sport Discus were searched through May 2022. Prior to submission, a follow-up database search was performed (January 2023). Studies of competitive athletes using HR-pQCT to assess bone quality were included. Athletes were aged between 14 and 45 years. Data extraction included study design and location (country), skeletal imaging modality and site, bone variables and any additional musculoskeletal-related outcome. Information identifying sports and athletes were also extracted. This review included 14 manuscripts and a total of 928 individuals (male: n=75; female: n=853). Athletes comprised 78% (n=722) of the included individuals and 93% of athletes were female. Assessment scores indicate the studies were good to fair quality. The athletes included in this review can be categorized into three groups: 1) healthy athletes, 2) athletes with compromised menstrual function (e.g., amenorrhoea), and 3) athletes with compromised bone health (e.g., bone stress injuries). When assessing bone quality using HR-pQCT, healthy competitive athletes had denser, stronger and larger bones with better microarchitecture, compared with controls. However, the same cannot be said for athletes with amenorrhoea or bone stress injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38037364PMC10696374W4389245071What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.