Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38037016›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2023

Impact of health-related behavioral factors on participation in a cervical cancer screening program: the lifelines population-based cohort.

Kelly M Castañeda, Grigory Sidorenkov, Marian J E Mourits, Bert van der Vegt, Albert G Siebers, Karin M Vermeulen, Ed Schuuring, G Bea A Wisman, Geertruida H de Bock

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Impact of Physical Activity on Metastatic Cancer at Diagnosis and Mortality: Results from the Lifelines Cohort Study.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kelly M CastañedaDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9700 RB, Groningen, the Netherlands. k.m.castaneda.vanegas@umcg.nl.
Grigory SidorenkovDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9700 RB, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Marian J E MouritsDepartment of Gynaecologic Oncology, Cancer Research Center Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Bert van der VegtDepartment of Pathology & Medical Biology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9700 RB, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Albert G SiebersDutch Nationwide Pathology Databank, PALGA, 3991 SZ, Houten, the Netherlands.
Karin M VermeulenDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9700 RB, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Ed SchuuringDepartment of Pathology & Medical Biology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9700 RB, Groningen, the Netherlands.
G Bea A WismanDepartment of Gynaecologic Oncology, Cancer Research Center Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Geertruida H de BockDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9700 RB, Groningen, the Netherlands.

Funding

ZonMw 531002021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRegular participation in cervical cancer screening is critical to reducing mortality. Although certain sociodemographic factors are known to be associated with one-time participation in screening, little is known about other factors that could be related to regular participation. Therefore, this study evaluated the association between health-related behavioral factors and regular participation in cervical cancer screening.

methodsThe Lifelines population-based cohort was linked to data for cervical cancer screening from the Dutch Nationwide Pathology Databank. We included women eligible for all four screening rounds between 2000 and 2019, classifying them as regular (4 attendances), irregular (1-3 attendances), and never participants. Multinomial logistic regression was performed to evaluate the association between behavioral factors and participation regularity, with adjustment made for sociodemographic factors.

resultsOf the 48,325 included women, 55.9%, 35.1%, and 9% were regular, irregular, and never screening participants. After adjustment for sociodemographic factors, the likelihood of irregular or never screening participation was increased by smoking, obesity, marginal or inadequate sleep duration, alcohol consumption and low physical activity, while it was decreased by hormonal contraception use.

conclusionAn association exists between unhealthy behavioral factors and never or irregular participation in cervical cancer screening.

Indexed as

Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsAlcohol DrinkingEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMass ScreeningObesityPatient ComplianceReproductive HistorySmokingEarly detection of cancerLifestylePatient complianceReproductive historyUterine cervical neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID38037016
PMCPMC10688458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.