Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38036970›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2023

Cultivar-specific dynamics: unravelling rhizosphere microbiome responses to water deficit stress in potato cultivars.

Benoit Renaud Martins, Roberto Siani, Krzysztof Treder, Dorota Michałowska, Viviane Radl, Karin Pritsch, Michael Schloter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Benoit Renaud MartinsResearch Unit for Comparative Microbiome Analysis (COMI), Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Neuherberg, Germany. benoitrenaud.martins@helmholtz-munich.de.
Roberto SianiResearch Unit for Comparative Microbiome Analysis (COMI), Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Neuherberg, Germany.
Krzysztof TrederPlant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute - National Research Institute in Radzików, Bonin Division, Department of Potato Protection and Seed Science at Bonin, 76-009, Bonin, Bonin Str 3, Poland.
Dorota MichałowskaPlant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute - National Research Institute in Radzików, Bonin Division, Department of Potato Protection and Seed Science at Bonin, 76-009, Bonin, Bonin Str 3, Poland.
Viviane RadlResearch Unit for Comparative Microbiome Analysis (COMI), Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Neuherberg, Germany.
Karin PritschResearch Unit for Environmental Simulation (EUS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Neuherberg, Germany.
Michael SchloterResearch Unit for Comparative Microbiome Analysis (COMI), Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Neuherberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGrowing evidence suggests that soil microbes can improve plant fitness under drought. However, in potato, the world's most important non-cereal crop, the role of the rhizosphere microbiome under drought has been poorly studied. Using a cultivation independent metabarcoding approach, we examined the rhizosphere microbiome of two potato cultivars with different drought tolerance as a function of water regime (continuous versus reduced watering) and manipulation of soil microbial diversity (i.e., natural (NSM), vs. disturbed (DSM) soil microbiome).

resultsWater regime and soil pre-treatment showed a significant interaction with bacterial community composition of the sensitive (HERBST) but not the resistant cultivar (MONI). Overall, MONI had a moderate response to the treatments and its rhizosphere selected Rhizobiales under reduced watering in NSM soil, whereas Bradyrhizobium, Ammoniphilus, Symbiobacterium and unclassified Hydrogenedensaceae in DSM soil. In contrast, HERBST response to the treatments was more pronounced. Notably, in NSM soil treated with reduced watering, the root endophytic fungus Falciphora and many Actinobacteriota members (Streptomyces, Glycomyces, Marmoricola, Aeromicrobium, Mycobacterium and others) were largely represented. However, DSM soil treatment resulted in no fungal taxa and fewer enrichment of these Actinobacteriota under reduced watering. Moreover, the number of bacterial core amplicon sequence variants (core ASVs) was more consistent in MONI regardless of soil pre-treatment and water regimes as opposed to HERBST, in which a marked reduction of core ASVs was observed in DSM soil.

conclusionsBesides the influence of soil conditions, our results indicate a strong cultivar-dependent relationship between the rhizosphere microbiome of potato cultivars and their capacity to respond to perturbations such as reduced soil moisture. Our study highlights the importance of integrating soil conditions and plant genetic variability as key factors in future breeding programs aiming to develop drought resistance in a major food crop like potato. Elucidating the molecular mechanisms how plants recruit microbes from soil which help to mitigate plant stress and to identify key microbial taxa, which harbour the respective traits might therefore be an important topic for future research.

Indexed as

ActinomycetalesMicrobiotaSolanum tuberosumStreptomycesPlant BreedingPlant RootsPlantsRhizosphereSoilSoil MicrobiologyWaterSoilWaterActinobacteriaDrought tolerancePotato rhizosphereRhizobialesSoil microbiome

Identifiers

PMID38036970
PMCPMC10691024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.