Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38036937›Full record

ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2024

A primer on the use of computational modelling to investigate affective states, affective disorders and animal welfare in non-human animals.

Vikki Neville, Michael Mendl, Elizabeth S Paul, Peggy Seriès, Peter Dayan

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Vikki NevilleBristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Langford, UK. vikki.neville@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2961-1353
Michael Mendl *Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Langford, UK.
Elizabeth S Paul *Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Langford, UK.
Peggy Seriès *Institute for Adaptive and Neural Computation, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Peter Dayan *Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics & University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
University of Bristol · GBAt Bristol · GBMax Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics · DEUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/T002654/1,BB/X009696/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective measures of animal emotion-like and mood-like states are essential for preclinical studies of affective disorders and for assessing the welfare of laboratory and other animals. However, the development and validation of measures of these affective states poses a challenge partly because the relationships between affect and its behavioural, physiological and cognitive signatures are complex. Here, we suggest that the crisp characterisations offered by computational modelling of the underlying, but unobservable, processes that mediate these signatures should provide better insights. Although this computational psychiatry approach has been widely used in human research in both health and disease, translational computational psychiatry studies remain few and far between. We explain how building computational models with data from animal studies could play a pivotal role in furthering our understanding of the aetiology of affective disorders, associated affective states and the likely underlying cognitive processes involved. We end by outlining the basic steps involved in a simple computational analysis.

Indexed as

Animal WelfareComputer SimulationMood DisordersAffectAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalHumans

Identifiers

PMID38036937
PMCPMC11039423
OpenAlexW4389209512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.