Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38036935›Full record

ArticleCulture, medicine and psychiatry2024

The Shaman and Schizophrenia, Revisited.

Tanya Marie Luhrmann, John Dulin, Vivian Dzokoto

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Culture, medicine and psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tanya Marie LuhrmannDepartment of Anthropology, Stanford University, Stanford, USA. luhrmann@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9923-4234
John DulinDepartment of Anthropology, Utah Valley State University, Orem, USA.
Vivian DzokotoDepartment of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, USA.
Stanford Medicine · USUtah Valley University · USVirginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

John Templeton Foundation 55427
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents evidence that some-but not all-religious experts in a particular faith may have a schizophrenia-like psychotic process which is managed or mitigated by their religious practice, in that they are able to function effectively and are not identified by their community as ill. We conducted careful phenomenological interviews, in conjunction with a novel probe, with okomfo, priests of the traditional religion in Ghana who speak with their gods. They shared common understandings of how priests hear gods speak. Despite this, participants described quite varied personal experiences of the god's voice. Some reported voices which were auditory and more negative; some seemed to describe trance-like states, sometimes associated with trauma and violence; some seemed to be described sleep-related events; and some seemed to be interpreting ordinary inner speech. These differences in description were supported by the way participants responded to an auditory clip made to simulate the voice-hearing experiences of psychosis and which had been translated into the local language. We suggest that for some individuals, the apprenticeship trained practice of talking with the gods, in conjunction with a non-stigmatizing identity, may shape the content and emotional tone of voices associated with a psychotic process.

Indexed as

Religion and PsychologySchizophreniaAdultFemaleGhanaHallucinationsHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSchizophrenic PsychologyTraditional Medicine PractitionersApprenticeshipPsychosisSchizophreniaShamanismVoices

Identifiers

PMID38036935
PMCPMC11362382
OpenAlexW4389165993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.