ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2024
Optical Elastography for Micropressure Characterization of Zebrafish Embryonic Cardiac Development.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The proper formation of the vertebrate embryonic heart relies on various mechanical forces which determine its form and function. Measuring these forces at the microscale of the embryo is a challenge. We propose a new tool utilizing high-resolution optical elastography and stiffness measurements of surrounding tissues to non-invasively track the changes in the pressure exerted by the heart on the neighboring yolk, as well as changes in contractile patterns during early cardiac growth in-vivo, using the zebrafish embryo as a model system. Cardiac development was characterized every three hours from 24 hours post-fertilization (hpf) to 30 hpf and compared between wildtype fish and those treated with MS-222, a commonly used fish anesthetic that decreases cardiac contractility. Wildtype embryos from 24 to 30 hpf showed an average yolk indentation pressure of 0.32 mmHg to 0.41 mmHg, respectively. MS-222 treated embryos showed an average yolk indentation pressure of 0.22 mmHg to 0.29 mmHg. Yolk indentation pressure between control and treated embryos at 24 hpf and 30 hpf showed a significant difference (p < 0.05). Our method allowed for contractility and pressure evaluation at these early developmental stages, which have not been previously reported in published literature, regardless of sample or imaging modality. This research could lead to a better understanding of heart development and improved diagnostic tools for congenital heart disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.