Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38036692›Full record

ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2024

Short-term outcomes after open versus robot-assisted repair of ventral hernias: a nationwide database study.

N A Henriksen, F Helgstrand, K K Jensen

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06232148 (Procedural Cost Analyses of Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair Compared With Laparoscopic or Open Repair), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06232148 completednot on this map

Procedural Cost Analyses of Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair Compared With Laparoscopic or Open Repair: A Cohort Study

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorBispebjerg HospitalRan2017 to 2023Enrolled3,000ConditionsVentral HerniaArmsType of surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Robotic-assisted ventral hernia repair - a detailed economic evaluation: is it worth it?Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Costing methodologies in robotic ventral hernia repair: a scoping review.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025
    Article
  7. Observational
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Cost analysis of open versus robot-assisted ventral hernia repair - a retrospective cohort study.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

N A HenriksenDepartment of Gastrointestinal and Hepatic Diseases, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark. nadiahenriksen@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1805-9866
F HelgstrandDepartment of Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Koege, Denmark.
K K JensenDepartment of Surgery and Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe robotic platform is widely implemented; however, evidence evaluating outcomes of robotic ventral hernia repair is still lacking. The aim of the study was to evaluate the short-term outcomes after open and robot-assisted repair of primary ventral and incisional hernias.

methodsNationwide register-based cohort study with data from the Danish Ventral Hernia Database and the National Danish Patients Registry was from January 1, 2017 to August 22, 2022. Robot-assisted ventral hernia repairs were propensity score matched 1:3 with open repairs according to the confounding variables defect size, Charlson comorbidity index score, and age. Logistic regression analyses were performed for factors associated with length of stay > 2 days, readmission, and reoperation within 90 days.

resultsA total of 528 and 1521 patients underwent robot-assisted and open repair, respectively. The mean length of hospital stay in days was 0.5 versus 2.1 for robot-assisted and open approach, respectively (P < 0.001) and open approach was correlated with risk of length of stay > 2 days (OR 23.25, CI 13.80-39.17, P < 0.001). The incidence of readmission within 90 days of discharge was significantly lower after robot-assisted repair compared to open approach (6.2% vs. 12.1%, P < 0.001). Open approach was independently associated with increased risk of readmission (OR 21.43, CI 13.28-39.17, P = 0.005, P < 0.001).

conclusionRobot-assisted ventral hernia repair is safe and feasible and associated with shorter length of stay and decreased risk of readmission compared with open ventral hernia repair.

Indexed as

Hernia, VentralIncisional HerniaRoboticsCohort StudiesHerniorrhaphyHumansIncisional herniaLength of stayReadmissionReoperationSurgical-site occurrenceUmbilical hernia

Identifiers

PMID38036692
PMCPMC10891222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.