Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38036602›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

AUCReshaping: improved sensitivity at high-specificity.

Sheethal Bhat, Awais Mansoor, Bogdan Georgescu, Adarsh B Panambur, Florin C Ghesu, Saahil Islam, Kai Packhäuser, Dalia Rodríguez-Salas, Sasa Grbic, Andreas Maier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sheethal BhatPattern Recognition Lab, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91058, Erlangen, Germany. sheethal.bhat@siemens-healthineers.com.
Awais MansoorDigital Technology and Innovation, Siemens Medical Solutions, Princeton, NJ, 08540, USA.
Bogdan GeorgescuDigital Technology and Innovation, Siemens Medical Solutions, Princeton, NJ, 08540, USA.
Adarsh B PanamburPattern Recognition Lab, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91058, Erlangen, Germany.
Florin C GhesuDigital Technology and Innovation, Siemens Medical Solutions, Princeton, NJ, 08540, USA.
Saahil IslamPattern Recognition Lab, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91058, Erlangen, Germany.
Kai PackhäuserPattern Recognition Lab, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91058, Erlangen, Germany.
Dalia Rodríguez-SalasPattern Recognition Lab, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91058, Erlangen, Germany.
Sasa GrbicDigital Technology and Innovation, Siemens Medical Solutions, Princeton, NJ, 08540, USA.
Andreas MaierPattern Recognition Lab, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91058, Erlangen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evaluation of deep-learning (DL) systems typically relies on the Area under the Receiver-Operating-Curve (AU-ROC) as a performance metric. However, AU-ROC, in its holistic form, does not sufficiently consider performance within specific ranges of sensitivity and specificity, which are critical for the intended operational context of the system. Consequently, two systems with identical AU-ROC values can exhibit significantly divergent real-world performance. This issue is particularly pronounced in the context of anomaly detection tasks, a commonly employed application of DL systems across various research domains, including medical imaging, industrial automation, manufacturing, cyber security, fraud detection, and drug research, among others. The challenge arises from the heavy class imbalance in training datasets, with the abnormality class often incurring a considerably higher misclassification cost compared to the normal class. Traditional DL systems address this by adjusting the weighting of the cost function or optimizing for specific points along the ROC curve. While these approaches yield reasonable results in many cases, they do not actively seek to maximize performance for the desired operating point. In this study, we introduce a novel technique known as AUCReshaping, designed to reshape the ROC curve exclusively within the specified sensitivity and specificity range, by optimizing sensitivity at a predetermined specificity level. This reshaping is achieved through an adaptive and iterative boosting mechanism that allows the network to focus on pertinent samples during the learning process. We primarily investigated the impact of AUCReshaping in the context of abnormality detection tasks, specifically in Chest X-Ray (CXR) analysis, followed by breast mammogram and credit card fraud detection tasks. The results reveal a substantial improvement, ranging from 2 to 40%, in sensitivity at high-specificity levels for binary classification tasks.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMammographyRadiographyROC CurveSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID38036602
PMCPMC10689839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.