Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38036584›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Integration of motion information in illusory motion perceived in stationary patterns.

Taisuke Kobayashi, Eiji Watanabe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Taisuke KobayashiLaboratory of Neurophysiology, National Institute for Basic Biology, Higashiyama 5-1, Myodaiji-Cho, Okazaki, Aichi, 444-8787, Japan. taisukekbys@gmail.com.
Eiji WatanabeLaboratory of Neurophysiology, National Institute for Basic Biology, Higashiyama 5-1, Myodaiji-Cho, Okazaki, Aichi, 444-8787, Japan. eijwat@gmail.com.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 21K12006Japan Society for the Promotion of Science,Japan 21H04426
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Illusory motion is a phenomenon in which stationary images with repeating luminance gradient patterns appear to be moving. In this study, we conducted experiments focusing on illusory motion to verify the hypothetical rule that velocity information, extracted from local luminance patterns, is integrated by summation in visual information processing. This rule is based on the hypothesis of velocity integration, and could estimate perceived velocity of stimulus. The summation rule was evaluated by a psychophysical experiment. Our results showed that the summation rule unbiasedly predicted perceived velocity, suggesting that an algorithm for integrating velocity information in illusory motion is based on the summation rule. These results would contribute to understanding of the spatial integration of local motion signals in visual information processing.

Indexed as

IllusionsMotion PerceptionHumansMotionVision, OcularVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID38036584
PMCPMC10689723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.