Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38036582›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

The time and place of origin of South Caucasian languages: insights into past human societies, ecosystems and human population genetics.

Alexander Gavashelishvili, Merab Chukhua, Kakhi Sakhltkhutsishvili, Dilek Koptekin, Mehmet Somel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexander GavashelishviliCenter of Biodiversity Studies, Institute of Ecology, Ilia State University, Cholokashvili Str. 5, 0162, Tbilisi, Georgia. aleksandre.gavashelishvili@iliauni.edu.ge.
Merab ChukhuaHead of the Institute of Caucasiology, Faculty of Humanities, Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Ilia Chavchavadze Str. 1, 0162, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Kakhi SakhltkhutsishviliGeorgian DNA Project, Family Tree DNA, Ilia State University, Cholokashvili Str. 5, 0162, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Dilek KoptekinDepartment of Biological Sciences, Middle East Technical University, 06800, Ankara, Turkey.
Mehmet SomelDepartment of Biological Sciences, Middle East Technical University, 06800, Ankara, Turkey.
Ilia State University · GEMiddle East Technical University · TRTbilisi State University · GE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study re-examines the linguistic phylogeny of the South Caucasian linguistic family (aka the Kartvelian linguistic family) and attempts to identify its Urheimat. We apply Bayesian phylogenetics to infer a dated phylogeny of the South Caucasian languages. We infer the Urheimat and the reasons for the split of the Kartvelian languages by taking into consideration (1) the past distribution ranges of wildlife elements whose names can be traced back to proto-Kartvelian roots, (2) the distribution ranges of past cultures and (3) the genetic variations of past and extant human populations. Our best-fit Bayesian phylogenetic model is in agreement with the widely accepted topology suggested by previous studies. However, in contrast to these studies, our model suggests earlier mean split dates, according to which the divergence between Svan and Karto-Zan occurred in the early Copper Age, while Georgian and Zan diverged in the early Iron Age. The split of Zan into Megrelian and Laz is widely attributed to the spread of Georgian and/or Georgian speakers in the seventh-eighth centuries CE. Our analyses place the Kartvelian Urheimat in an area that largely intersects the Colchis glacial refugium in the South Caucasus. The divergence of Kartvelian languages is strongly associated with differences in the rate of technological expansions in relation to landscape heterogeneity, as well as the emergence of state-run communities. Neolithic societies could not colonize dense forests, whereas Copper Age societies made limited progress in this regard, but not to the same degree of success achieved by Bronze and Iron Age societies. The paper also discusses the importance of glacial refugia in laying the foundation for linguistic families and where Indo-European languages might have originated.

Indexed as

EcosystemGenetics, PopulationBayes TheoremHumansLanguagePhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID38036582
PMCPMC10689496
OpenAlexW4389192496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.