Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38036568›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Weakened weekdays: lockdown disrupts the weekly cycle of risk tolerance.

Virginia Fedrigo, Benno Guenther, Rob Jenkins, Matteo M Galizzi, Jet G Sanders

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Virginia FedrigoDepartment of Psychological and Behavioural Sciences, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE, UK. v.a.fedrigo@lse.ac.uk.
Benno GuentherDepartment of Psychological and Behavioural Sciences, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE, UK.
Rob JenkinsDepartment of Psychology, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Matteo M GalizziDepartment of Psychological and Behavioural Sciences, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE, UK.
Jet G SandersDepartment of Psychological and Behavioural Sciences, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE, UK.

Funding

British Academy MD19\190023Leverhulme Trust RF-2020-448\10
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Risk tolerance decreases from Monday to Thursday and increases on Friday. Antecedents of this weekly risk cycle are difficult to investigate experimentally as manipulating the seven-day cycle is impractical. Here we used temporal disorientation during the UK COVID-19 lockdown to conduct a natural experiment. In two studies, we measured responses to risk in participants with either a strong or weak sense of weekday, after either a short or long period of disruption to their weekly routine by lockdown. In Study 1 (N = 864), the weekly risk cycle was consistent in risk attitude measures specifically to participants who reported a strong sense of weekday. In Study 2 (N = 829), the weekly risk cycle was abolished, even for participants who retained a strong sense of weekday. We propose that two factors sustain the weekly risk cycle. If the sense of weekday is lacking, then weekday will have little effect because the current day is not salient. If weekday associations decay, then weekday will have little effect because the current day is not meaningful. The weekly risk cycle is strong and consistent when (i) sense of weekday is robust and (ii) weekday associations are maintained.

Indexed as

Risk AssessmentTime FactorsHumans

Identifiers

PMID38036568
PMCPMC10689774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.