Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38036540›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

Quantifying global colonization pressures of alien vertebrates from wildlife trade.

Yiming Li, Tim M Blackburn, Zexu Luo, Tianjian Song, Freyja Watters, Wenhao Li, Teng Deng, Zhenhua Luo, Yuanyi Li, Jiacong Du and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Yiming LiSchool of Life Sciences, Institute of Life Sciences and Green Development, Hebei University, Baoding, 071002, China. liym@ioz.ac.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-5251-2601
Tim M BlackburnCentre for Biodiversity and Environment Research, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0152-2663
Zexu LuoKey Laboratory of Animal Ecology and Conservation Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1 Beichen West Road, Chaoyang, 100101, Beijing, China.
Tianjian SongKey Laboratory of Animal Ecology and Conservation Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1 Beichen West Road, Chaoyang, 100101, Beijing, China.
Freyja WattersInvasion Science & Wildlife Ecology Lab, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Wenhao LiKey Laboratory of Animal Ecology and Conservation Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1 Beichen West Road, Chaoyang, 100101, Beijing, China.
Teng DengKey Laboratory of Animal Ecology and Conservation Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1 Beichen West Road, Chaoyang, 100101, Beijing, China.
Zhenhua LuoSchool of Life Sciences, Central China Normal University, NO.152 Luoyu Road, Wuhan, 430079, Hubei, China.
Yuanyi LiSchool of Life Sciences, Institute of Life Sciences and Green Development, Hebei University, Baoding, 071002, China.
Jiacong DuSchool of Life Sciences, Institute of Life Sciences and Green Development, Hebei University, Baoding, 071002, China.
Meiling NiuSchool of Life Sciences, Institute of Life Sciences and Green Development, Hebei University, Baoding, 071002, China.
Jun ZhangSchool of Life Sciences, Institute of Life Sciences and Green Development, Hebei University, Baoding, 071002, China.
Jinyu ZhangSchool of Life Sciences, Institute of Life Sciences and Green Development, Hebei University, Baoding, 071002, China.
Jiaxue YangSchool of Life Sciences, Institute of Life Sciences and Green Development, Hebei University, Baoding, 071002, China.
Siqi WangKey Laboratory of Animal Ecology and Conservation Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1 Beichen West Road, Chaoyang, 100101, Beijing, China.
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNHebei University · CNThe University of Adelaide · AUUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNZoological Society of London · GB

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 32030070
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The global trade in live wildlife elevates the risk of biological invasions by increasing colonization pressure (the number of alien species introduced to an area). Yet, our understanding of species traded as aliens remains limited. We created a comprehensive global database on live terrestrial vertebrate trade and use it to investigate the number of traded alien species, and correlates of establishment richness for aliens. We identify 7,780 species involved in this trade globally. Approximately 85.7% of these species are traded as aliens, and 12.2% of aliens establish populations. Countries with greater trading power, higher incomes, and larger human populations import more alien species. These countries, along with island nations, emerge as hotspots for establishment richness of aliens. Colonization pressure and insularity consistently promote establishment richness across countries, while socio-economic factors impact specific taxa. Governments must prioritize policies to mitigate the release or escape of traded animals and protect global biosecurity.

Indexed as

Introduced SpeciesWildlife TradeAnimalsHumansVertebrates

Identifiers

PMID38036540
PMCPMC10689770
OpenAlexW4389217912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.