Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38035734›Full record

ReviewBMJ global health2023

Designing the global vaccine supply chain: balancing intellectual property rights with post COVID-19 vaccine equity.

Sung-Pil Park, Hye Jin Lee, Yang Yu, Eric Yong Joong Lee, Young Soo Park

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ global health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sung-Pil ParkKorea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, South Korea.
Hye Jin LeeIntellectual Property High Court, Daejeon, South Korea.
Yang YuShanghai University of International Business and Economics, Shanghai, China.
Eric Yong Joong LeeDongguk University College of Law, Jung-gu, Seoul, South Korea grotian@dongguk.edu pysttl3459@kaist.ac.kr.ORCID 0000-0001-5640-490X
Young Soo ParkKorea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, South Korea grotian@dongguk.edu pysttl3459@kaist.ac.kr.
Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology · KRDongguk University · KRKorean Intellectual Property Office · KRShanghai University of International Business and Economics · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article aims to propose practical solutions that coordinate the conflicting interests between the global community and the pharmaceutical industry on the intellectual property (IP) waiver for COVID-19 vaccines and facilitate a more equitable vaccine supply chain in the post-COVID-19 world. We critically conducted a narrative literature review to identify procedural and practical issues in the current vaccine supply chain. The search was conducted across various academic disciplines, including biomedical science, life science, law and social science, using resources such as PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and Westlaw. After screening 731 articles, 55 studies were selected for review. The narrative review revealed several critical barriers that hinder vaccine supply in less-developed countries (LDCs) as follows: (1) WTO Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPs) waiver requests may not be granted due to its stringent consensus rule; (2) the current compulsory license system may not work due to the complexity of IP rights covering COVID-19 vaccine technologies; (3) only a few LDCs have domestic companies capable of manufacturing vaccines, and (4) political and economic tensions among countries exacerbate existing barriers to vaccine distribution in LDCs. Based on these findings, we proposed a comprehensive compulsory license system, which combines TRIPS's compulsory license system with the third-party beneficiary mechanism under Common Law. This integrated approach offers a balanced solution that ensures fair compensation for vaccine developers while facilitating broader vaccine access.

Indexed as

COVID-19VaccinesCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansIntellectual PropertyInternational CooperationCOVID-19 VaccinesVaccinesCOVID-19Health policyPublic HealthReviewVaccines

Identifiers

PMID38035734
PMCPMC10689365
OpenAlexW4389177248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.