Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38035631›Full record

ArticleQualitative health research2024

"There's So Much More Support We Could Have Provided": Child Life Specialists' Stories of the Challenges Working in Adult Oncology.

Shipra Taneja, Meredith Vanstone, David L Lysecki, Heather McKean, Daryl Bainbridge, Jonathan Sussman, Monica Molinaro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Qualitative health research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Integration of child life into adult oncology: a qualitative descriptive analysis of the experiences of patients, children, co-parents, and providers.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shipra TanejaDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2623-8952
Meredith VanstoneDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7347-6259
David L LyseckiDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Heather McKeanHamilton Health Sciences, McMaster Children's Hospital, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Daryl BainbridgeDepartment of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Jonathan SussmanDepartment of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Monica MolinaroDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A cancer diagnosis in patients who are parents of minor children is uniquely stressful for both parents and children. Children need developmentally appropriate information and support to help reduce their fears and worries. Child life specialists (CLSs) are health professionals who work in pediatric environments to support children and families with the stress and uncertainty of illnesses. Increasingly, CLSs have been called upon to support children of patients in adult clinical environments. Our objective was to elucidate CLS caregiving narratives related to working with children of adult cancer patients. We used narrative inquiry to interview four CLSs working in adult oncology. Canadian CLSs who have experience providing care for children and families affected by parental cancer were recruited via convenience sampling. We used narrative analysis methods that included multiple close reads of the data, generating narrative themes, and noting conflicts or tensions in the data. CLSs' caregiving stories often highlighted the complexities of working in an adult oncology environment. Their narratives included challenges in providing optimal care to the children, including family-level barriers (such as parental wishes to withhold information from their children) and systemic barriers (such as late referrals and limited options for bereavement support). CLS participants identified several challenges of working with families in adult oncology. The CLSs highlighted a desire for additional institutional support for children of adult oncology patients and for themselves working in these environments in order to achieve what they believed to be optimal care.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsAdultCanadaCaregiversChildFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMedical OncologyMiddle AgedNarrationParentsQualitative ResearchSocial SupportStress, Psychologicalchallengeschild life specialistdeathnarrativeoncologypalliative carestresssystemic barriers

Identifiers

PMID38035631
PMCPMC11481406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.