ArticleMultiple sclerosis and related disorders2024
A pilot trial of ocrelizumab for modulation of meningeal enhancement in multiple sclerosis.
Article in Multiple sclerosis and related disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dura mater enhancement on 3T MRI is associated with cortical lesion burden in multiple sclerosis.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- The CNS Meninges and the Synovial Joint: Parallel Immunological Structures in Autoimmune Disease.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026Review
- The Evolution of Anti-CD20 Treatment for Multiple Sclerosis: Optimization of Antibody Characteristics and Function.CNS drugs · 2025Review
- Neurodegeneration correlates of iron-related lesions and leptomeningeal inflammation in multiple sclerosis clinical subtypes.Neuroradiology · 2025Article
- Meningeal contrast enhancement in multiple sclerosis: Assessment of field strength, acquisition delay, and clinical relevance.PloS one · 2024Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAutopsy data suggests that meningeal inflammation in multiple sclerosis (MS) is driven by CD20+ B-cells. Ocrelizumab is an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, and thus could potentially ameliorate meningeal inflammation in MS. Leptomeningeal enhancement (LME) on MRI is suggested as a surrogate biomarker of meningeal inflammation in MS, and thus may be a way of monitoring for this treatment effect.
objectivesTo determine if ocrelizumab impacts meningeal enhancement (ME) on 7T MRI in MS.
methodsTwenty-two patients with MS started on ocrelizumab by their treating physician were enrolled into this single-center, open-label, prospective trial. Participants underwent 7T MRI of the brain prior to first infusion, with screening for the presence of LME. Fourteen patients (48 ± 11 years; 11 women) had LME on the baseline scan and were invited to return for an additional 7T MRI after 1 year of treatment. Fourteen MS patients (49 ± 10 years; 11 women) on non-CD20 treatment from a separate observational cohort of annual 7T MRIs were used for comparison - matched for LME at baseline, age, and sex. Post-contrast FLAIR and subtraction images were reviewed for LME and paravascular and dural enhancement (PDE).
resultsAll subjects in the ocrelizumab and comparison groups had LME and PDE on their baseline scan. At the beginning of the study the mean number of foci of LME and PDE in the study group were 2.3 ± 1.7 and 6.6 ± 3.9 respectively. Mean LME and PDE count for the comparison group were 1.7 ± 1.5 and 7.8 ± 5.5. Mean volume of LME in the study group was 50.5 mm
conclusionIn this small pilot trial, ocrelizumab did not significantly reduce the number or volume of foci of LME or PDE in MS patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.