ArticleTranslational neuroscience2023
Predicting functional outcome in acute ischemic stroke patients after endovascular treatment by machine learning.
Article in Translational neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Endovascular thrombectomy for acute stroke in anticoagulated patients: systematic review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Pooled it
- Identification of signal-based gait features and blood analytes associated with stroke status and walking speed in mild acute ischemic stroke.BMC neurology · 2026Article
- Machine learning for predicting functional outcomes in acute ischemic stroke: insights from a nationwide stroke registry.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Novel Risk Score to Predict Poor Outcome After Endovascular Treatment in Anterior Circulation Occlusive Acute Ischemic Stroke.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Plasma D-dimer can predict all-cause mortality after mechanical thrombectomy of anterior circulation noncardioembolic acute cerebral infarction.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2025Article
- Construction and validation of a predictive model for poor long-term prognosis in severe acute ischemic stroke after endovascular treatment based on LASSO regression.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Endovascular therapy (EVT) was the standard treatment for acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion. Prognosis after EVT is always a major concern. Here, we aimed to explore a predictive model for patients after EVT. Method: A total of 156 patients were retrospectively enrolled. The primary outcome was functional dependence (defined as a 90-day modified Rankin Scale score ≤ 2). Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator and univariate logistic regression were used to select predictive factors. Various machine learning algorithms, including multivariate logistic regression, linear discriminant analysis, support vector machine, Result: Six predictive factors were selected, namely, age, baseline National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, Alberta Stroke Program Early CT (ASPECT) score, modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction score, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), and complications (pulmonary infection, gastrointestinal bleeding, and cardiovascular events). Based on these variables, various models were constructed and showed good discrimination. Finally, a nomogram was constructed by multivariate logistic regression and showed a good performance. Conclusion: Our nomogram, which was composed of age, baseline NIHSS score, ASPECT score, recanalization status, sICH, and complications, showed a very good performance in predicting outcome after EVT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.