Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38035125›Full record

ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2023

Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against hospitalisation in Latin America during three pandemic waves, 2021-2022: a test-negative case-control design.

Francisco Nogareda, Annette K Regan, Paula Couto, Ashley L Fowlkes, Radhika Gharpure, Sergio Loayza, Juliana Almeida Leite, Angel Rodríguez, Andrea Vicari, Eduardo Azziz-Baumgartner and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Francisco NogaredaPan American Health Organization, Washington, DC, USA.
Annette K ReganPan American Health Organization, Washington, DC, USA.
Paula CoutoPan American Health Organization, Washington, DC, USA.
Ashley L FowlkesNational Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, U.S. CDC, USA.
Radhika GharpureNational Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, U.S. CDC, USA.
Sergio LoayzaPan American Health Organization, Washington, DC, USA.
Juliana Almeida LeitePan American Health Organization, Washington, DC, USA.
Angel RodríguezPan American Health Organization, Washington, DC, USA.
Andrea VicariPan American Health Organization, Washington, DC, USA.
Eduardo Azziz-BaumgartnerNational Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, U.S. CDC, USA.
Daniel SalasPan American Health Organization, Washington, DC, USA.
REVELAC-i Working Group
World Health Organization Regional Office for the Americas · USNational Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Vaccine effectiveness (VE) is essential to monitor the performance of vaccines and generate strategic information to guide decision making. We pooled data from six Latin American countries to estimate the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines in preventing laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 hospitalisation during three different pandemic waves from February 2021 to September 2022. Methods: We used a test-negative case-control design in hospitalised adults in Chile, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Guatemala, Paraguay, and Uruguay. We estimated adjusted VE by age group (18-64 and ≥65 years), vaccine type and product for primary series vaccination and booster vaccination and by time since last dose during the Omicron variant dominant period. We used mixed effects logistic regression models adjusting for sex, age, week of onset of symptom onset and pre-existing conditions with country fit as a random effect term. Findings: We included 15,241 severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) patients in the analysis. Among adults 18-64 years, VE estimates for primary series vaccination during pre-Delta and Delta periods ranged by product from 66.5% to 95.1% and from 33.5% to 88.2% for older adults. During the Omicron period, VE estimates for primary series were lower and decreased by time since last vaccination, but VE increased to between 26.4% and 57.4% when a booster was administered. Interpretation: mRNA and viral vector vaccines presented higher VE for both primary series and booster. While VE decreased over time, protection against severe COVID-19-associated hospitalisation increased when booster doses were administered. Vaccination with additional doses should be recommended, particularly for persons at increased risk of developing severe COVID-19. Funding: This work was supported by a grant from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) through cooperative agreements with the Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization.

Indexed as

AdultsCOVID-19 vaccine effectivenessHospitalisationsLatin AmericaOlder adultsSevere acute respiratory infectionsSouthern hemisphereTest-negative case-control design

Identifiers

PMID38035125
PMCPMC10682274
OpenAlexW4388561213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.