Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38035122›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X2023

Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) in gynecological emergencies.

Rafael Ferro, Yannick Hurni, Stéphanie Seidler, Daniela Huber

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Vaginal NOTES adnexal surgery: Results of a retrospective cohort study in The Netherlands.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2025
    Article
  4. Early experience with the gasless vNOTES technique for adnexal surgery.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Observational
  5. Article
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rafael FerroDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Valais Hospital, Av. du Grand-Champsec 80, 1951 Sion, Switzerland.
Yannick HurniDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Valais Hospital, Av. du Grand-Champsec 80, 1951 Sion, Switzerland.
Stéphanie SeidlerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Valais Hospital, Av. du Grand-Champsec 80, 1951 Sion, Switzerland.
Daniela HuberDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Valais Hospital, Av. du Grand-Champsec 80, 1951 Sion, Switzerland.
Hôpital du Valais · CHUniversity Hospital of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) is an emerging minimally invasive approach increasingly applied to perform many gynecological procedures. Despite a still limited level of evidence, compared to conventional laparoscopy, vNOTES seems to be associated with reduced blood loss, shorter operative time, less postoperative pain, shorter hospitalization time, better cosmetic results and decreased postoperative morbidity. Although growing evidence supports the effectiveness of vNOTES for elective adnexal surgeries, there is still limited knowledge regarding its feasibility and safety in emergency settings. In the present study, we report our experience performing vNOTES in gynecological emergency cases. Study design: We prospectively collected and analyzed data from patients who underwent vNOTES for gynecological emergencies between November 2021 and June 2023. Demographic and perioperative characteristics were collected and analyzed. Results: Seventeen patients were included. Interventions were realized for suspicion of ectopic pregnancy in 7 cases (41.2%), for suspicion of adnexal torsion in 7 cases (41.2%), for post-hysterectomy hemoperitoneum in 2 cases (11.8%), and for uncontrollable uterine bleeding in 1 case (5.9%). Emergency procedures included unilateral salpingectomy (35.3%), ovarian cystectomy (23.5%), ovarian cystotomy (17.6%), adnexal detorsion (11.8%), hemoperitoneum drainage (11.8%), hysterectomy (5.9%), and appendectomy (5.9%). The overall median operative time was 38 [18-72] minutes. The median estimated intraoperative blood loss was 30 [5-150] mL, and no intraoperative complications occurred. Conversion to conventional laparoscopy or laparotomy was never needed. Patients stayed hospitalized for a median time of 30 [4-144] hours after the intervention. The median visual analog scale value for postoperative pain evaluation was 2 [0-5] at 12, 24, and 48 postoperative hours. No complications associated with the procedure occurred. Conclusions: This study demonstrated the feasibility of performing vNOTES procedures for managing gynecological emergencies such as tubal ectopic pregnancy, adnexal torsion, painful ovarian lesions, post-hysterectomy hemoperitoneum, and uncontrollable uterine bleeding. Associated with data reported in the available literature, our results suggest potential benefits in treating gynecological emergencies by vNOTES over conventional laparoscopy. However, stronger evidence from larger studies is needed to confirm it.

Indexed as

Adnexal torsionEctopic pregnancyGynecological emergenciesNatural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgeryVNOTES

Identifiers

PMID38035122
PMCPMC10686844
OpenAlexW4388840305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.