ArticleFrontiers in immunology2023
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predicting the unpredictable: prognostic and predictive power of FAPI-PET imaging in oncology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Pooled it
- Trial
- Diagnostic value of [Scientific reports · 2026Observational
- Article
- Tumor Characterization Using [Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Gastrointestinal tumor personalized immunotherapy: an integrated analysis from molecular genetics to imaging biomarkers.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This prospective study examined whether metabolism parameters obtained using the tracer Patients and methods: The 24 enrolled LA-ESCC patients underwent an Results: The SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVpeak and SUVsd were significantly higher in patients with positive expression than in negative expression (all p < 0.05). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified SUVmean (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.882, p = 0.004), SUVsd (AUC = 0.874, p = 0.005), SUVpeak (AUC = 0.840, p = 0.010) and SUVmax (AUC = 0.765, p = 0.045) as significant predictors of the PD-L1 positive expression, with cutoff values of 9.67, 1.90, 9.67 and 13.71, respectively. On univariate logistic regression analysis, SUVmean (p = 0.045), SUVsd (p = 0.024), and SUVpeak (p = 0.031) were significantly correlated with the PD-L1 positive expression. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, SUVsd (p = 0.035) was an optimum predictor factor for PD-L1 positive expression. Conclusion:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.