ReviewJACS Au2023
3D-Printed Materials for Wastewater Treatment.
Review in JACS Au, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- 3D printing for sustainable water treatment: innovations, applications, and future perspectives.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Review
- Article
- The Use of 3D-Printed Polymer Components for the Removal of Heavy Metals and Dyes from Water: A Systematic Literature Review.Polymers · 2026Review
- Recent advances in 3D printing for biochemical and environmental analysis.Mikrochimica acta · 2026Review
- Removal of Contaminants of Emerging Concern from Wastewater Using Photocatalytic Membranes: Current Status and Challenges.Membranes · 2026Review
- 3D Printing of FeACS omega · 2025Article
- 33 Unresolved Questions in Nanoscience and Nanotechnology.ACS nano · 2025Article
- Fabrication of Organic/Inorganic Nanocomposites: From Traditional Synthesis to Additive Manufacturing.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025Review
- A Critical Review of Membrane Distillation Using Ceramic Membranes: Advances, Opportunities and Challenges.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Membrane for Pressure-Driven Separation Prepared with a Method of 3D Printing: Performance in Concentrating Orange Peel Extract.Membranes · 2025Article
- Polymeric Membranes for Liquid Separation: Innovations in Materials, Fabrication, and Industrial Applications.Polymers · 2024Review
- Recycling and 3D-Printing Biodegradable Membranes for Gas Separation-toward a Membrane Circular Economy.ACS applied engineering materials · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increasing levels of water pollution pose an imminent threat to human health and the environment. Current modalities of wastewater treatment necessitate expensive instrumentation and generate large amounts of waste, thus failing to provide ecofriendly and sustainable solutions for water purification. Over the years, novel additive manufacturing technology, also known as three-dimensional (3D) printing, has propelled remarkable innovation in different disciplines owing to its capability to fabricate customized geometric objects rapidly and cost-effectively with minimal byproducts and hence undoubtedly emerged as a promising alternative for wastewater treatment. Especially in membrane technology, 3D printing enables the designing of ultrathin membranes and membrane modules layer-by-layer with different morphologies, complex hierarchical structures, and a wide variety of materials otherwise unmet using conventional fabrication strategies. Extensive research has been dedicated to preparing membrane spacers with excellent surface properties, potentially improving the membrane filtration performance for water remediation. The revolutionary developments in membrane module fabrication have driven the utilization of 3D printing approaches toward manufacturing advanced membrane components, including biocarriers, sorbents, catalysts, and even whole membranes. This perspective highlights recent advances and essential outcomes in 3D printing technologies for wastewater treatment. First, different 3D printing techniques, such as material extrusion, selective laser sintering (SLS), and vat photopolymerization, emphasizing membrane fabrication, are briefly discussed. Importantly, in this Perspective, we focus on the unique 3D-printed membrane modules, namely, feed spacers, biocarriers, sorbents, and so on. The unparalleled advantages of 3D printed membrane components in surface area, geometry, and thickness and their influence on antifouling, removal efficiency, and overall membrane performance are underlined. Moreover, the salient applications of 3D printing technologies for water desalination, oil-water separation, heavy metal and organic pollutant removal, and nuclear decontamination are also outlined. This Perspective summarizes the recent works, current limitations, and future outlook of 3D-printed membrane technologies for wastewater treatment.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.