Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38034960›Full record

ArticleJACS Au2023

Deep Learning Dynamic Allostery of G-Protein-Coupled Receptors.

Hung N Do, Jinan Wang, Yinglong Miao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JACS Au, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Visualizing agonist-induced M2 receptor activation regulated by aromatic ring dynamics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Embracing exascale computing in nucleic acid simulations.Current opinion in structural biology · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hung N DoComputational Biology Program and Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66047, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6497-4096
Jinan WangComputational Biology Program and Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66047, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0162-212X
Yinglong MiaoComputational Biology Program and Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66047, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3714-1395
University of Kansas · US

Funding

Enhanced Sampling of G-Protein-Coupled Receptor-G Protein InteractionsR01GM132572 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MIAO, YINGLONG · 2019 to 2023
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM132572
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) make up the largest superfamily of human membrane proteins and represent primary targets of ∼1/3 of currently marketed drugs. Allosteric modulators have emerged as more selective drug candidates compared with orthosteric agonists and antagonists. However, many X-ray and cryo-EM structures of GPCRs resolved so far exhibit negligible differences upon the binding of positive and negative allosteric modulators (PAMs and NAMs). The mechanism of dynamic allosteric modulation in GPCRs remains unclear. In this work, we have systematically mapped dynamic changes in free energy landscapes of GPCRs upon binding of allosteric modulators using the Gaussian accelerated molecular dynamics (GaMD), deep learning (DL), and free energy prOfiling Workflow (GLOW). GaMD simulations were performed for a total of 66 μs on 44 GPCR systems in the presence and absence of the modulator. DL and free energy calculations revealed significantly reduced dynamic fluctuations and conformational space of GPCRs upon modulator binding. While the modulator-free GPCRs often sampled multiple low-energy conformational states, the NAMs and PAMs confined the inactive and active agonist-G-protein-bound GPCRs, respectively, to mostly only one specific conformation for signaling. Such cooperative effects were significantly reduced for binding of the selective modulators to "non-cognate" receptor subtypes. Therefore, GPCR allostery exhibits a dynamic "conformational selection" mechanism. In the absence of available modulator-bound structures as for most current GPCRs, it is critical to use a structural ensemble of representative GPCR conformations rather than a single structure for compound docking ("ensemble docking"), which will potentially improve structure-based design of novel allosteric drugs of GPCRs.

Identifiers

PMID38034960
PMCPMC10685416
OpenAlexW4388211834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.