ArticleCase reports in pulmonology2023
COVID-19, HIV, and Cryptococcal Meningitis Coinfections with Abnormal Laboratory Findings.
Article in Case reports in pulmonology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Case report: Experience and insights on the treatment of two cases of cryptococcal meningitis during the later stages of the COVID-19 pandemic.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was first introduced in China in 2019, and it has rapidly spread all around the world. Methods: Here, we report a case of coinfection with COVID-19 and cryptococcal meningitis in a HIV-positive patient with abnormal laboratory findings. In this case, COVID-19 was positive by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and computerized tomography (CT) scan diagnosis. Cryptococcal antigen testing of CSF was negative, whereas India ink staining and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) culture confirmed the presence of Results: Although the patient was in a critical stage of illness, serum and CSF levels of procalcitonin were abnormally low, within normal limits. On the other hand, although initial lumbar puncture had showed elevated protein level, the repeat CSFs presented remarkably reduced protein levels. Our findings indicate that despite COVID-19 infection, procalcitonin level may remain normal in HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis, and findings of an apparently normal procalcitonin level should not exclude the possibility of infection. Also, antigen testing may present false-negative result, and it should not be the sole laboratory method for diagnosis of infectious meningitis. Consequently, CSF culture and staining is recommended, even when antigen testing of organism is negative and CSF profile is unremarkable. Conclusion: Laboratory information should be combined with a good understanding of clinical manifestations of patient to determine if meningitis is present and confirmed COVID-19 should not ignore possibility of other infections for consideration.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.