Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38034896›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2023

Establishment and Validation of a Machine Learning-Based Prediction Model for Termination of Pregnancy via Cesarean Section.

Rui Zhang, Weixuan Sheng, Feiran Liu, Jin Zhang, Wenpei Bai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of general medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rui ZhangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Weixuan ShengDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Feiran LiuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Jin ZhangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Wenpei BaiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the risk factors of cesarean section and establish a prediction model for cesarean section based on the characteristics of pregnant women. Methods: The clinical characteristics of 2552 singleton pregnant women who delivered a live baby between January 2020 and December 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. They were divided into vaginal delivery group (n = 1850) and cesarean section group (n = 702). These subjects were divided into training set (2020.1-2021.6) and validation set (2021.7-2021.12). In the training set, univariate analysis, Lasso regression, and Boruta were used to screen independent risk factors for cesarean section. Four models, including Logistic Regression (LR), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Classification and Regression Tree (CART), and Random forest (RF), were established in the training set using K-fold cross validation, hyperparameter optimization, and random oversampling techniques. The best model was screened, and Sort graph of feature variables, univariate partial dependency profile, and Break Down profile were delineated. In the validation set, the confusion matrix parameters were calculated, and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), precision recall curve (PRC), calibration curve, and clinical decision curve analysis (DCA) were delineated. Results: The risk factors of cesarean section included age and height of women, weight at delivery, weight gain, para, assisted reproduction, abnormal blood glucose during pregnancy, pregnancy hypertension, scarred uterus, premature rupture of membrane (PROM), placenta previa, fetal malposition, thrombocytopenia, floating fetal head, and labor analgesia. RF had the best performance among the four models, and the accuracy of confusion matrix parameters was 0.8956357. The Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) was 0.753012. The area under ROC (AUC-ROC) was 0.9790787, and the area under PRC (AUC-PRC) was 0.957888. Conclusion: RF prediction model for caesarean section has high discrimination performance, accuracy and consistency, and outstanding generalization ability.

Indexed as

caesarean sectionconfusion matrixmachine learningunivariate partial dependence profile

Identifiers

PMID38034896
PMCPMC10685106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.