ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2023
Establishment and Validation of a Machine Learning-Based Prediction Model for Termination of Pregnancy via Cesarean Section.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the risk factors of cesarean section and establish a prediction model for cesarean section based on the characteristics of pregnant women. Methods: The clinical characteristics of 2552 singleton pregnant women who delivered a live baby between January 2020 and December 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. They were divided into vaginal delivery group (n = 1850) and cesarean section group (n = 702). These subjects were divided into training set (2020.1-2021.6) and validation set (2021.7-2021.12). In the training set, univariate analysis, Lasso regression, and Boruta were used to screen independent risk factors for cesarean section. Four models, including Logistic Regression (LR), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Classification and Regression Tree (CART), and Random forest (RF), were established in the training set using K-fold cross validation, hyperparameter optimization, and random oversampling techniques. The best model was screened, and Sort graph of feature variables, univariate partial dependency profile, and Break Down profile were delineated. In the validation set, the confusion matrix parameters were calculated, and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), precision recall curve (PRC), calibration curve, and clinical decision curve analysis (DCA) were delineated. Results: The risk factors of cesarean section included age and height of women, weight at delivery, weight gain, para, assisted reproduction, abnormal blood glucose during pregnancy, pregnancy hypertension, scarred uterus, premature rupture of membrane (PROM), placenta previa, fetal malposition, thrombocytopenia, floating fetal head, and labor analgesia. RF had the best performance among the four models, and the accuracy of confusion matrix parameters was 0.8956357. The Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) was 0.753012. The area under ROC (AUC-ROC) was 0.9790787, and the area under PRC (AUC-PRC) was 0.957888. Conclusion: RF prediction model for caesarean section has high discrimination performance, accuracy and consistency, and outstanding generalization ability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.