ArticleHeart rhythm O22023
Heart failure risk in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with catheter ablation vs antiarrhythmic drugs.
Article in Heart rhythm O2, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Discontinuation of Oral Anticoagulation After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation - Are We Ready to Change Clinical Practice in 2026?Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Review
- Heart Failure in Atrial Fibrillation Subtypes in Women and Men in the Tromsø Study.JACC. Advances · 2025Article
- Racial and Ethnic Differences in Initiation and Discontinuation of Antiarrhythmic Medications in Management of Atrial Fibrillation.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) increases heart failure (HF) risk. Whereas the risk of HF-related hospitalization and mortality are known in the setting of AF, the impact of AF treatment on HF development is understudied. Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare HF incidence among AF patients treated with antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) vs catheter ablation (CA). Methods: AF patients with 1 prior AAD usage were identified in 2014-2022 Optum Clinformatics database. Patients were classified into 2 cohorts: those receiving CA vs those receiving a different AAD prescription. The 2 cohorts were matched on sociodemographic and clinical covariates using propensity score matching technique. Cox regression model was used to compare incident HF risk in the 2 cohorts. Subgroup analyses were performed by race/ethnicity, sex, AF subtype, and CHA Results: After matching, 9246 patients were identified in each cohort (AAD and CA). Patients receiving CA had a 57% lower risk of incident HF than those treated with AADs (hazard ratio [HR] 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.40-0.46). Subgroup analysis by race/ethnicity depicted similar results, with non-Hispanic White (HR 0.43; 95% CI 0.40-0.46), non-Hispanic Black (HR 0.46; 95% CI 0.35-0.60), Hispanic (HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.40-0.70), and Asian (HR 0.46; 95% CI 0.24-0.92) patients treated with CA (vs AAD) having significantly lower risk of HF, respectively. The effect size of CA remained significant in subgroups defined by sex, AF subtypes, and CHA Conclusion: AF patients receiving CA had ∼57% lower risk of developing HF than those receiving AAD. The lower risk of HF associated with CA vs AAD persisted across different race/ethnicity, sex, AF subtypes, and CHA2DS2-VASc score.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.