ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
Reliability of remote National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center Uniform Data Set data.
Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-site video-based assessment with the NACC UDS-Version 3 battery: Design and participant experience in the V-Cog study.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Trial
- Evaluating the accuracy and reliability of telephone-derived Clinical Dementia Rating scores: A comparative analysis with in-person assessments.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- The remote administration of the uniform data set neuropsychological test battery (I-UDSNB) Italian version: normative data.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025Article
- Synergistic effects of multiple pathological processes on Alzheimer's disease risk: Evidence for age-dependent stroke interactions.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2025Article
- Implementation of Telemedicine for Patients With Dementia and Their Caregivers: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Virtual Data Collection Strategies in Research on Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD).Innovation in aging · 2025Article
- Application of the Uniform Data Set version 3 tele-adapted test battery (T-cog) for remote cognitive assessment preoperatively in older adults.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2024Article
- Examining a Preclinical Alzheimer's Cognitive Composite for Telehealth Administration for Reliability Between In-Person and Remote Cognitive Testing with Neuroimaging Biomarkers.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2024Article
- Remote digital cognitive assessment in a trial-ready Alzheimer's disease cohort: A scalable approach for early intervention studies.Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)Article
- Reliability of remote National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center Uniform Data Set data.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
- Comprehension of Miranda warnings in adults with chronic, moderate-severe traumatic brain injury.Journal of communication disordersObservational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) Uniform Data Set (UDS) neuropsychological battery is being used to track cognition in participants across the country, but it is unknown if scores obtained through remote administration can be combined with data obtained in person.
methodsThe remote UDS battery includes the blind version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Number Span, Semantic and Phonemic Fluency, and Craft Story. For these tests, we assessed intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) between in-person and remote scores in 3838 participants with both in-person and remote UDS assessments, and we compared annual score changes between modalities in a subset that had two remote assessments.
resultsAll tests exhibited moderate to good reliability between modalities (ICCs = 0.590-0.787). Annual score changes were also comparable between modalities except for Craft Story Immediate Recall, Semantic Fluency, and Phonemic Fluency. DISCUSSION: Our findings generally support combining remote and in-person scores for the majority of UDS tests.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.