Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38034842›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2023

Operational changes to the lupus intervention fatigue trial as a result of COVID-19: An update to the study protocol.

D Kinnett-Hopkins, R Ramsey-Goldman, H Milaeger, J S Chmiel, A Chung, D Erickson, A Kenney, L Rosiles, L Ehrlich-Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

D Kinnett-HopkinsSchool of Kinesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
R Ramsey-GoldmanNorthwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
H MilaegerNorthwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
J S ChmielNorthwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
A ChungNorthwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
D EricksonNorthwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
A KenneyNorthwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
L RosilesNorthwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
L Ehrlich-JonesNorthwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

Northwestern University Clinical and Translational Science Institute (NUCATS)UL1TR001422 · NCATS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI D'AQUILA, RICHARD · 2015 to 2023
$56.8M
Resource CoreP30AR072579 · NIAMS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI NAN E ROTHROCK · 2017 to 2026
$8.3M
Northwestern University Clinical and Translational Science Institute (NUCATS)KL2TR001424 · NCATS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI SHARMA, LEENA · 2015 to 2023
$8.1M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001424NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001422NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR072579
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) global pandemic drastically impacted the health system and the research community. As a result, research institutions and funding agencies recommended a moratorium on conducting in-person research and study enrollment until protocol changes to protect participant safety were approved and implemented. We detail the operational modifications made to the Lupus Intervention Fatigue Trial (LIFT) protocol and summarize how we met the varied challenges created by COVID-19. Methods: We evaluated study protocols and determined that scheduling, acquiring consent, in-person assessments and intervention baseline visits, patient reported outcomes, and data processing procedures needed modification. Results: Operational modifications were made to ensure study progress while adhering to COVID-19 restrictions. Major changes included electronic consent, remote baseline visits for those in the intervention, self-report outcome measures at home via emailed weblinks, and telemedicine physician assessment visits. The collection of safety labs presented the largest challenge since this required an in-person visit to a laboratory. The study team elected to delay this up to one month after the physician assessment. All follow-up visits were completed, and no participants withdrew from the study. Conclusion: LIFT was severely impacted by COVID-19. We provide insight into how our study protocol was modified without compromising the integrity of the primary and secondary outcomes of the study. The modifications utilized by the LIFT study resulted in efficiencies that will be included in a revised protocol and may serve as a useful example for other behavioral interventions to adapt their research studies.

Indexed as

Clinical trialCoronavirus 2019Systemic lupus erythematosus

Identifiers

PMID38034842
PMCPMC10682518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.