ArticleHeliyon2023
Brain tumor feature extraction and edge enhancement algorithm based on U-Net network.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Brain Tumor Classification in MRI Scans Using Edge Computing and a Shallow Attention-Guided CNN.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Local-global multi-scale attention network for medical image segmentation.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Statistics show that each year more than 100,000 patients pass away from brain tumors. Due to the diverse morphology, hazy boundaries, or unbalanced categories of medical data lesions, segmentation prediction of brain tumors has significant challenges. Purpose: In this thesis, we highlight EAV-UNet, a system designed to accurately detect lesion regions. Optimizing feature extraction, utilizing automatic segmentation techniques to detect anomalous regions, and strengthening the structure. We prioritize the segmentation problem of lesion regions, especially in cases where the margins of the tumor are more hazy. Methods: The VGG-19 network structure is incorporated into the coding stage of the U-Net, resulting in a deeper network structure, and an attention mechanism module is introduced to augment the feature information. Additionally, an edge detection module is added to the encoder to extract edge information in the image, which is then passed to the decoder to aid in reconstructing the original image. Our method uses the VGG-19 in place of the U-Net encoder. To strengthen feature details, we integrate a CBAM (Channel and Spatial Attention Mechanism) module into the decoder to enhance it. To extract vital edge details from the data, we incorporate an edge recognition section into the encoder. Results: All evaluation metrics show major improvements with our recommended EAV-UNet technique, which is based on a thorough analysis of experimental data. Specifically, for low contrast and blurry lesion edge images, the EAV-Unet method consistently produces forecasts that are very similar to the initial images. This technique reduced the Hausdorff distance to 1.82, achieved an F1 score of 96.1%, and attained a precision of 93.2% on Dataset 1. It obtained an F1 score of 76.8%, a Precision of 85.3%, and a Hausdorff distance reduction to 1.31 on Dataset 2. Dataset 3 displayed a Hausdorff distance cut in 2.30, an F1 score of 86.9%, and Precision of 95.3%. Conclusions: We conducted extensive segmentation experiments using various datasets related to brain tumors. We refined the network architecture by employing smaller convolutional kernels in our strategy. To further improve segmentation accuracy, we integrated attention modules and an edge enhancement module to reinforce edge information and boost attention scores.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.