ArticleHeliyon2023
Meta-analysis of the relationship between montelukast use and neuropsychiatric events in patients with allergic airway disease.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Montelukast in paediatric asthma and allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2023Pooled it
- Comparison of ICS dose reduction vs. montelukast discontinuation for step-down therapy in well-controlled asthma: a pilot randomized controlled trial.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025Trial
- Machine learning-based discovery of GW3965 as a therapeutic compound against invasive emm92-type group A Streptococcus.npj antimicrobials and resistance · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based discovery of GW3965 as a therapeutic compound against invasive emm92-type group A Streptococcus.Research square · 2026Article
- Montelukast: risk of mental disorders vs. efficacy-a meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Use of montelukast, as a cause of neuropsychiatric events, in patients with asthma or allergic rhinitis is controversial, and comprehensive statistical analyses verifying this relationship remain lacking. To better understand the relationship between montelukast and neuropsychiatric events, it is vital to guide patients in the effective use of the drug, especially in children whose mothers are concerned about its side effects. In this study, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating montelukast and neuropsychiatric events were retrieved from a literature search of the Medline (1966 to February 2023), Embase (1974 to February 2023), Web of Science, and other related databases. After screening, 18 RCTs were ultimately included in a meta-analysis to merge statistics, which demonstrated no significant increase in neuropsychiatric events compared with placebo. A similar pattern of adverse neuropsychiatric events was observed in patients grouped according to age, with headache being the most common adverse neuropsychiatric event. Overall, montelukast did not significantly increase neuropsychiatric events in patients with allergic rhinitis and/or asthma compared with placebo. Large-sample RCTs are needed to verify the association between neuropsychiatric events and montelukast use in children, and attention is also devoted to FDA warnings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.