ArticleHeliyon2023
Deep learning for the prediction of type 2 diabetes mellitus from neck-to-knee Dixon MRI in the UK biobank.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neck-to-knee dixon MRI thigh volume as a superior mass biomarker for Sarcopenia: evidence from the UK biobank.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- An ensemble-based machine learning model for predicting type 2 diabetes and its effect on bone health.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- A novel interpretable deep transfer learning combining diverse learnable parameters for improved T2D prediction based on single-cell gene regulatory networks.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rationale and objectives: We evaluate the automatic identification of type 2 diabetes from neck-to-knee, two-point Dixon MRI scans with 3D convolutional neural networks on a large, population-based dataset. To this end, we assess the best combination of MRI contrasts and stations for diabetes prediction, and the benefit of integrating risk factors. Materials and methods: Subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus have been identified in the prospective UK Biobank Imaging study, and a matched control sample has been created to avoid confounding bias. Five-fold cross-validation is used for the evaluation. All scans from the two-point Dixon neck-to-knee sequence have been standardized. A neural network that considers multi-channel MRI input was developed and integrates clinical information in tabular format. An ensemble strategy is used to combine multi-station MRI predictions. A subset with quantitative fat measurements is identified for comparison to prior approaches. Results: MRI scans from 3406 subjects (mean age, 66.2 years ± 7.1 [standard deviation]; 1128 women) were analyzed with 1703 diabetics. A balanced accuracy of 78.7 %, AUC ROC of 0.872, and an average precision of 0.878 was obtained for the classification of diabetes. The ensemble over multiple Dixon MRI stations yields better performance than selecting the individually best station. Moreover, combining fat and water scans as multi-channel inputs to the networks improves upon just using single contrasts as input. Integrating clinical information about known risk factors of diabetes in the network boosts the performance across all stations and the ensemble. The neural network achieved superior results compared to the prediction based on quantitative MRI measurements. Conclusions: The developed deep learning model accurately predicted type 2 diabetes from neck-to-knee two-point Dixon MRI scans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.