ArticleHeliyon2023
A novel approach for standardizing clinical laboratory categorical test results using machine learning and string distance similarity.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Population health management fit lifecycles in analytics.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Diagnosis Based on Population Data versus Personalized Data: The Evolving Paradigm in Laboratory Medicine.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Standardizing clinical laboratory test results is critical for conducting clinical data science research and analysis. However, standardized data processing tools and guidelines are inadequate. In this paper, a novel approach for standardizing categorical test results based on supervised machine learning and the Jaro-Winkler similarity algorithm is proposed. A supervised machine learning model is used in this approach for scalable categorization of the test results into predefined groups or clusters, while Jaro-Winkler similarity is used to map text terms into standard clinical terms within these corresponding groups. The proposed method is applied to 75062 test results from two private hospitals in Bangladesh. The Support Vector Classification algorithm with a linear kernel has a classification accuracy of 98%, which is better than the Random Forest algorithm when categorizing test results. The experiment results show that Jaro-Winkler similarity achieves a remarkable 99.93% success rate in the test result standardization for the majority of groups with manual validation. The proposed method outperforms previous studies that concentrated on standardizing test results using rule-based classifiers on a smaller number of groups and distance similarities such as Cosine similarity or Levenshtein distance. Furthermore, when applied to the publicly available MIMIC-III dataset, our approach also performs excellently. All these findings show that the proposed standardization technique can be very beneficial for clinical big data research, particularly for national clinical research data hubs in low- and middle-income countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.