Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38034650›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Smart contracts and homomorphic encryption for private P2P energy trading and demand response on blockchain.

Dan Mitrea, Liana Toderean, Tudor Cioara, Ionut Anghel, Marcel Antal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dan MitreaComputer Science Department, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Memorandumului 28, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Liana TodereanComputer Science Department, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Memorandumului 28, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Tudor CioaraComputer Science Department, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Memorandumului 28, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Ionut AnghelComputer Science Department, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Memorandumului 28, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Marcel AntalComputer Science Department, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Memorandumului 28, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blockchain technology offers great value in terms of decentralization, data integrity, transparency, and traceability, however the transactional data is public, and accessible raising concerns about violating privacy regulations. For example, in the peer-to-peer energy trading and demand response use cases, the data stored in blockchain may allow a third party to infer the load profiles or even identify the behind the meter assets. In this paper, we employ homomorphic techniques to encrypt the energy transactional data stored on the blockchain allowing the smart contracts functions responsible for implementing the business logic of the energy flexibility trading and settlement to perform computations on encrypted data. As computations on smart contracts and public blockchains can be expensive, we have used the lighter version of the Partial Homomorphic Encryption scheme to obfuscate the energy data. To ensure the validity of the smart contracts' functions executed on encrypted data, we leverage on the consensus mechanism of the blockchain network, thus ensuring computation correctness. The solution was validated considering a micro-grid with 12 prosumers that trade their flexibility peer-to-peer (P2P). The results demonstrate the feasibility of maintaining encrypted energy data on the blockchain, executing smart contract functions on encrypted data, and preserving the privacy of computations. As anticipated, the trade-off for better privacy is the gas consumption overhead of the smart contracts' functions which is higher compared to the non-encrypted case, depending on the length of the public-private keys pair. Nonetheless, our solution exhibits consistent execution times for smart contracts, making it suitable for private networks where gas costs are of minimal concern.

Indexed as

BlockchainDemand responseEncrypted dataP2P energy tradingPrivacySmart contracts

Identifiers

PMID38034650
PMCPMC10687045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.