Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38034535›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2023

Comparison of 1064-nm Nd:YAG picosecond laser using fractional micro-lens array vs. ablative fractional 2940-nm Er:YAG laser for the treatment of atrophic acne scar in Asians: a 20-week prospective, randomized, split-face, controlled pilot study.

Ru Dai, Yiyu Cao, Yiping Su, Suiqing Cai

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05686603 (Comparison of 1064nm Nd), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05686603 nacompletednot on this map

Comparison of 1064nm Nd:YAG Picosecond Lasers Using Fractional Micro-lens Array vs. Ablative Fractional 2940nm Er:YAG Lasers for the Treatment of Atrophic Acne Scar in Asians: a 20-week Prospective, Randomized, Split-face, Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSecond Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of MedicineRan2022 to 2022Enrolled33ConditionsAcne, Atrophic ScarArmsa fractional 1064-nm neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) picosecond laser with MLA handpiece, a ablative fractional 2940-nm Er:YAG laser
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ru DaiDepartment of Dermatology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Yiyu CaoResearch Department of Industrial Development, Zhejiang Development & Planning Institute, Hangzhou, China.
Yiping SuDepartment of Dermatology, The First People Hospital of Hangzhou Linan District, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Suiqing CaiDepartment of Dermatology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University · CNHangzhou Medical College · CNZhejiang Provincial Institute of Communications Planning,Design & Research · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The 1064-nm Nd:YAG picosecond lasers using fractional micro-lens array (P-MLA) was a promising therapy for skin resurfacing. However, no studies have compared P-MLA with ablative fractional 2940-nm Er:YAG lasers (AF-Er) in the treatment of atrophic acne scars. Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of P-MLA and AF-Er for the treatment of atrophic acne scars. Methods: We performed a prospective, randomized, split-face, controlled pilot study. Thirty-one Asian patients with mild to moderate atrophic acne scars underwent four consecutive sessions of randomized split-face treatment with P-MLA and AF-Fr at 4-week intervals. The efficacy of the two devices were evaluated by Echelle d'Evaluation Clinique des Cicatrices d'acne (ECCA) grading scale, Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score and patient's satisfaction. VISIA analysis was also performed to evaluate the pore and skin texture. Adverse events were recorded at each follow-up. Results: The P-MLA afforded comparable clinical responses in scar appearance as AF-Er based on the investigator's assessments (ECCA percent reduction: 39.11% vs. 43.73%; IGA score: 2.97 ± 0.65 vs. 3.16 ± 0.68; Conclusion: Compared with AF-Er, P-MLA afforded comparable effect and more safety profiles in treating atrophic acne scars in Asian patients. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT05686603.

Indexed as

acne scarefficacy and safetyfractional laser ablationlaser treatmentpicosecond laser

Identifiers

PMID38034535
PMCPMC10687437
OpenAlexW4388723905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.