ReviewPostepy psychiatrii neurologii2023
Time of day and chronotype in the assessment of cognitive functions.
Review in Postepy psychiatrii neurologii, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Caffeine expectancy, explicit and implicit memory performance among female nursing students: a placebo-controlled quasi-experimental study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Associations between chronotype, physical activity and cognition in a free-living setting.Experimental brain research · 2026Article
- The Role of Sleep on Physical and Cognitive Performance of Ultra-Endurance Athletes: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- German version of subjective methods for measuring activation, mental workload, and attention in control rooms.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Adolescent circadian sleep health: a review of multimodal assessment strategies and clinical implications.Frontiers in sleep · 2026Review
- Chronotype-specific associations of sleep-wake schedule with behavioral, physiological, and psychological parameters.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2026Article
- Hemispheric efficiency during the day: the influence of circadian preference and time-of-day on verbal and visuospatial tasks.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Lifestyle Behaviors and Cognitive Well-Being: A Cross-Sectional Study Exploring the Role of Lifestyle Factors Among Omani University Students.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Reconciling the Neurophysiological and Cognitive Theories of Stimulus-Response Spatial Compatibility Effects: A Visual-Motor Dissociation Approach.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- How chronotype, sleep-wake cycle, subjective time experience influence retrospective, and prospective memory functioning.Frontiers in cognition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Circadian rhythms are synchronized, through the endogenous biological clock, with the 24-hour cycle, and associated with numerous changes in human functioning, both in physical and mental aspects. It is assumed that daily fluctuations in cognitive performance are a consequence of interacting homeostatic and circadian processes regulating an individual's sleep-wake rhythms. A chronotype may be understood as a phenotype of circadian cycles determined by an endogenous biological clock. Despite research findings showing a significant relationship between those factors and cognition, they remain insufficiently considered in the domain of cognitive psychology and neuropsychology. Views: This narrative review aims to describe and highlight the interactions between the time of day, chronotype, and cognitive performance in domains of mental activity variables, receptive functions, memory and learning, expressive functions, and thinking. Conclusions: The results of the research show that time-of-day effects on basic and more complex cognitive functions depend on an individual's chronotype with a dominant effect of synchrony between chronotype and time of cognitive testing, with large differences in circadian cycles between younger and older age groups. It is suggested that chronotype assessment and time of day control should be included as important variables in the diagnosis of cognitive function in both healthy and clinical populations. There is also an emerging need for further investigations to better understand how chronotype and circadian rhythms modulate human brain physiology and cognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.