ArticleJPGN reports2023
Evaluation of Newborn Direct Bilirubin As Screening for Cholestatic Liver Disease.
Article in JPGN reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of an age-adapted simplified acute physiology score II using first-24-hour variables in pediatric patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia: the CDH-SAPS.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Biliary atresia (BA) remains the most common indication for pediatric liver transplantation. Early diagnosis is essential for a favorable long-term prognosis for patients with BA. Preliminary data suggests that measurement of direct bilirubin (DB) in newborns may be an effective screening tool for neonatal cholestasis, particularly BA, allowing for early referral and diagnosis. The objective of our study was to establish a cutoff DB value to predict diagnosis of cholestatic liver disease (CLD) with high sensitivity and specificity, as well as, to evaluate whether newborns with elevated DB received appropriate follow-up in our health system. Methods: Baseline data were collected on infants born between 2016 and 2019 who had serum total bilirubin and DB drawn in the nursery, and who continued to follow in our health system. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were examined using cutoff values of 0.5, 0.6, and 0.7 mg/dL for identifying infants at risk for CLD. Patients' charts were reviewed to note whether they had follow-up levels drawn by their pediatrician or by the hepatology team within 2 months of age and whether they were diagnosed with CLD. Results: Serum total bilirubin and DB levels were drawn from 11 965 infants during their hospitalizations. Three infants from this cohort were diagnosed with CLD: 2 with BA and 1 with Alagille syndrome. DB cutoff values of 0.5, 0.6, and 0.7 mg/dL had sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 96.83% (95% confidence interval [CI], 96.69%-97.53%), 99.08% (95% CI, 98.81%-99.30%), and 99.63% (95% CI, 99.4%-99.7%), respectively. Given that a DB of 0.6 mg/dL had a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 99%, this value was chosen as the cutoff value to monitor for DB follow-up and diagnosis of CLD. Out of 60 infants who met criteria for DB ≥0.6 mg/dL, only 15 (25%) had a repeat level drawn after nursery discharge; 3 (5%) were eventually diagnosed with CLD. Conclusions: A DB cutoff value of 0.6 mg/dL yielded high sensitivity and specificity for identifying patients with CLD. All 3 patients diagnosed with CLD had elevated DB at hospital discharge. The data revealed that the majority (75%) of eligible newborns did not receive follow-up for their elevated DB in the outpatient setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.