Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38034395›Full record

ArticleTranslational animal science2023

Statistical and machine learning approaches to describe factors affecting preweaning mortality of piglets.

Md Towfiqur Rahman, Tami M Brown-Brandl, Gary A Rohrer, Sudhendu R Sharma, Vamsi Manthena, Yeyin Shi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational animal science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Md Towfiqur RahmanDepartment of Biological Systems Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68503, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9520-2753
Tami M Brown-BrandlDepartment of Biological Systems Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68503, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0874-8035
Gary A RohrerUSDA-ARS, US Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE 68933, USA.
Sudhendu R SharmaDepartment of Biological Systems Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68503, USA.
Vamsi ManthenaDepartment of Statistics, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68503, USA.
Yeyin ShiDepartment of Biological Systems Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68503, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High preweaning mortality (PWM) rates for piglets are a significant concern for the worldwide pork industries, causing economic loss and well-being issues. This study focused on identifying the factors affecting PWM, overlays, and predicting PWM using historical production data with statistical and machine learning models. Data were collected from 1,982 litters from the U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Nebraska, over the years 2016 to 2021. Sows were housed in a farrowing building with three rooms, each with 20 farrowing crates, and taken care of by well-trained animal caretakers. A generalized linear model was used to analyze the various sow, litter, environment, and piglet parameters on PWM. Then, different models (beta-regression and machine learning model: a random forest [RF]) were evaluated. Finally, the RF model was used to predict PWM and overlays for all listed contributing factors. On average, the mean birth weight was 1.44 kg, and the mean mortality was 16.1% where 5.55% was for stillbirths and 6.20% was contributed by overlays. No significant effect was found for seasonal and location variations on PWM. Significant differences were observed in the effects of litter lines on PWM (

Indexed as

machine learningpigletspreweaning mortalityrandom forestswine

Identifiers

PMID38034395
PMCPMC10684129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.