Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38034391›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2023

Effect of different exercise regimens on LVEF and restenosis incidence in patients after PCI: a network meta-analysis and an overview of systematic reviews.

Hongpeng Li, Li Lu, Zhongyu Han, Zhixiang Liu, Juanhong Pan, Yongsheng Wang, Xiuhua Gao, Yijin Cai, Tianyu Zhao, Qian Nie and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hongpeng Li *School of Medical and Life Sciences, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Li Lu *School of Medical and Life Sciences, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Zhongyu Han *School of Medical and Life Sciences, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Zhixiang LiuSchool of Health Preservation and Rehabilitation, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Juanhong PanSchool of Health Preservation and Rehabilitation, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Yongsheng WangSchool of Health Preservation and Rehabilitation, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Xiuhua GaoDepartment of Rehabilitation, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Yijin CaiSchool of Medical and Life Sciences, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Tianyu ZhaoDepartment of Rehabilitation, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Qian NieSecond Department of Cardiology, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Hongcai ZhangSecond Department of Cardiology, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Di ZhangDepartment of Rehabilitation, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Song JinDepartment of Rehabilitation, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to evaluate the effects of different exercise rehabilitation (ER) programs on LVEF and the incidence of restenosis in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) through a systematic review and an integrated network meta-analysis (NMA) to provide a reference for the clinical formulation of ER programs for PCI patients. Methods: Meta-analyses of the effects of different types of ER programs on LVEF and the incidence of reinfarction in post-PCI patients were retrieved from 11 domestic and foreign databases. The methodological and reporting quality of the included systematic reviews were evaluated using the AMSTAR 2 and PRISMA statements. The GRADE scoring system was used to evaluate the quality of evidence found in the studies included in the meta-analysis, and studies with high and intermediate-quality evidence were qualitatively analyzed. Stata software (version 16.0) was used to conduct an integrated NMA of the original RCTs with moderate and low risk of bias. Result: Sixteen meta-analyses were included in this evaluation. The reporting quality of the included meta-analyses was relatively complete, and the methodological quality was low. Seventy RCTs were included in the NMA. The results showed that all types of rehabilitative exercises were safe and effectively increased LVEF and reduced the incidence of coronary restenosis in patients. The comprehensive exercise program was the most likely to improve LVEF, and the comprehensive exercise program, early exercise program, and high-intensity interval exercise were better than aerobic exercise. Comprehensive exercise programs, early exercise programs, and aerobic exercise reduced the incidence of restenosis in patients. However, Chinese Qigong did not reduce the incidence of restenosis in patients, and there was a risk of bias and inconsistency in the quantitative analysis of restenosis incidence. Conclusion: Comprehensive exercise programs have the greatest therapeutic significance in improving cardiac output and reducing restenosis rates in post-PCI patients. The early exercise program has great potential but requires kinesiologists to work with physicians to structure the program and strengthen out-of-hospital management. Aerobic exercise has the least therapeutic significance, and Chinese Qigong is suitable for promotion based on its better efficacy than aerobic exercise and may be an alternative to aerobic exercise, but more experimental evidence is needed. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, PROSPERO CRD42022374590.

Indexed as

coronary heartexercise rehabilitationmeta-analysisPCIsports medicine

Identifiers

PMID38034391
PMCPMC10686069
OpenAlexW4388656848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.