Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38034308›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2023

Combining contour and region for closed boundary extraction of a shape.

Doreen Hii, Zygmunt Pizlo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Doreen HiiVisual Perception Laboratory, Department of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
Zygmunt PizloVisual Perception Laboratory, Department of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study explored human ability to extract closed boundary of a target shape in the presence of noise using spatially global operations. Specifically, we investigated the contributions of contour-based processing using line edges and region-based processing using color, as well as their interaction. Performance of the subjects was reliable when the fixation was inside the shape, and it was much less reliable when the fixation was outside. With fixation inside the shape, performance was higher when both contour and color information were present compared to when only one of them was present. We propose a biologically-inspired model to emulate human boundary extraction. The model solves the shortest (least-cost) path in the log-polar representation, a representation which is a good approximation to the mapping from the retina to the visual cortex. Boundary extraction was framed as a global optimization problem with the costs of connections calculated using four features: distance of interpolation, turning angle, color similarity and color contrast. This model was tested on some of the conditions that were used in the psychophysical experiment and its performance was similar to the performance of subjects.

Indexed as

boundary extractioncolorcontourDijkstra algorithmlog-polar representation

Identifiers

PMID38034308
PMCPMC10684737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.