Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38034233›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Gross Hydrocele With Completely Buried Penis: A Case Report.

Rahul D Pathrikar, Rohan R Kadak, Pranjali P Muley, Parikshit A Muley, Kamlesh J Wasnik, Nishikant Ingole

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rahul D PathrikarDepartment of Urology, Fortis Hospital, Mumbai, IND.
Rohan R KadakDepartment of Surgery, Datta Meghe Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research (DU), Wardha, IND.
Pranjali P MuleyDepartment of Physiology, Datta Meghe Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research (DU), Wardha, IND.
Parikshit A MuleyDepartment of Physiology, Datta Meghe Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research (DU), Wardha, IND.
Kamlesh J WasnikDepartment of Surgery, Datta Meghe Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research (DU), Wardha, IND.
Nishikant IngoleDepartment of Pharmacology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research (DU), Wardha, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A gross hydrocele is caused by fluid accumulation within a layer wrapped around the testicle, called the tunica vaginalis, derived from the peritoneum. A 65-year-old male complained of a non-tender, fluctuant bulge in his right scrotum despite having a fully buried penis, a large hydrocele, and urinary retention. After ultrasonography, the diagnosis was confirmed, and the patient underwent a successful surgical procedure that included a hydrocelectomy and tunica vaginalis excision. The patient reported few postoperative complications and a notable improvement in his quality of life. Surgery is a successful approach for treating gross hydrocele, with minimal morbidity and excellent cosmetic outcomes.

Indexed as

gross hydrocelescrotal swellingsupra-pubic cathetertestistunica vaginalis

Identifiers

PMID38034233
PMCPMC10683930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.