Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38034093›Full record

ArticlePNAS nexus2023

Estimating the environmental impacts of global lithium-ion battery supply chain: A temporal, geographical, and technological perspective.

Jorge A Llamas-Orozco, Fanran Meng, Gavin S Walker, Amir F N Abdul-Manan, Heather L MacLean, I Daniel Posen, Jon McKechnie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PNAS nexus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. ToxicToxins · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Li-ion battery industry and its challenges.Nature reviews. Chemistry · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jorge A Llamas-OrozcoSustainable Process Technologies Research Group, Department of Mechanical, Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4263-4901
Fanran MengDepartment of Chemical & Biological Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Sir Robert Hadfield Building, Mappin Street, Sheffield S1 3JD, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9014-1231
Gavin S WalkerSustainable Process Technologies Research Group, Department of Mechanical, Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK.
Amir F N Abdul-MananStrategic Transport Analysis Team, Transport Technology R&D, Research & Development Center (R&D), Saudi Aramco, Dhahran 31311, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3180-7646
Heather L MacLeanDepartment of Civil & Mineral Engineering, University of Toronto, 35 St.George Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A4, Canada.
I Daniel PosenDepartment of Civil & Mineral Engineering, University of Toronto, 35 St.George Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A4, Canada.
Jon McKechnieSustainable Process Technologies Research Group, Department of Mechanical, Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A sustainable low-carbon transition via electric vehicles will require a comprehensive understanding of lithium-ion batteries' global supply chain environmental impacts. Here, we analyze the cradle-to-gate energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of current and future nickel-manganese-cobalt and lithium-iron-phosphate battery technologies. We consider existing battery supply chains and future electricity grid decarbonization prospects for countries involved in material mining and battery production. Currently, around two-thirds of the total global emissions associated with battery production are highly concentrated in three countries as follows: China (45%), Indonesia (13%), and Australia (9%). On a unit basis, projected electricity grid decarbonization could reduce emissions of future battery production by up to 38% by 2050. An aggressive electric vehicle uptake scenario could result in cumulative emissions of 8.1 GtCO

Indexed as

battery recyclingelectricity decarbonizationlife cycle assessmentlithium-ion batterysupply chain GHG emissions

Identifiers

PMID38034093
PMCPMC10683946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.