ArticleJournal of oral and maxillofacial pathology : JOMFP
Role of immunohistochemistry in diagnosing round-cell tumours affecting the oral and maxillofacial regions.
Article in Journal of oral and maxillofacial pathology : JOMFP. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Diaspora of oral maxillofacial pathology and dermatopathology-A review.Bioinformation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: One of the most challenging spectra of lesions in the oral and maxillofacial region (OMFR) are round-cell tumours (RCTs). They show a considerable degree of overlap in microscopy and immunophenotypes. The main aim of this study is to analyse the spectrum of RCTs encountered in the oral and maxillofacial regions. We emphasise the role of immunohistochemistry (IHC) which in conjunction with histological, clinical, and imaging findings is necessary for their correct characterisation. The secondary objectives are to discuss differential diagnosis, workflow, and diagnostic algorithm for round-cell lesions affecting the OMFR. Methods: Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections of RCTs were retrieved from the archives of the Department of Oral Pathology (January 2018 to March 2020). These cases were analysed by three pathologists independently by evaluating haematoxylin and eosin-stained sections, and immunohistochemical markers employed to characterise these lesions. Results: Under the spectrum of RCTs, 11 cases (0.53%) were diagnosed with a predominance of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (55%) followed by Ewing sarcoma (18%). The remaining were Langerhans cell histiocytosis (9%), neuroendocrine carcinoma (9%), and sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma (9%). Except for one case, in all cases, the final diagnosis was established with the use of adjunctive IHC. Conclusion: RCTs can pose a diagnostic challenge for inexperienced oral pathologists. Thorough knowledge of the differentials of RCT occurring in oral and maxillofacial is helpful. An algorithm-based diagnostic approach incorporating the clinical, imaging, and histomorphological findings and immunohistochemical evaluation can help in minimizing diagnostic confusion and errors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.