Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38033926›Full record

ArticleStrategies in trauma and limb reconstruction

Circular External Fixator Removal in the Outpatient Clinic Using Regional Anaesthesia: A Pilot Study of a Novel Approach.

Luke Michael Williams, Giles Stamps, Helen Peak, Shiv Kumar Singh, Badri Narayan, Simon Matthew Graham, Nicholas Peterson

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Strategies in trauma and limb reconstruction. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. PenthroxStrategies in trauma and limb reconstruction
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Luke Michael WilliamsDepartment of Limb Reconstruction, Trauma and Orthopaedics, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, England, United Kingdom.
Giles StampsDepartment of Limb Reconstruction, Trauma and Orthopaedics, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, England, United Kingdom.
Helen PeakDepartment of Limb Reconstruction, Trauma and Orthopaedics, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, England, United Kingdom.
Shiv Kumar SinghDepartment of Anaesthetics, Liverpool University Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, England, United Kingdom.
Badri NarayanDepartment of Limb Reconstruction, Trauma and Orthopaedics, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, England, United Kingdom.
Simon Matthew GrahamDepartment of Limb Reconstruction, Trauma & Orthopaedics, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, England, United Kingdom; Department of Orthopaedics, Oxford University, Oxford, England, United Kingdom.
Nicholas PetersonDepartment of Limb Reconstruction, Trauma & Orthopaedics, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, England, United Kingdom.
University of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: External fixator (EF) devices are commonly used in the management of complex skeletal trauma, as well as in elective limb reconstruction surgery for the management of congenital and acquired pathology. The subsequent removal of an EF is commonly performed under general anaesthesia in an operating theatre. This practice is resource-intensive and limits the amount of time available for other surgical cases in the operating theatre. We aimed to assess the use of regional anaesthesia as an alternative method of analgesia to facilitate the EF removal in an outpatient setting. Design and methods: This prospective case series evaluated the first 50 consecutive cases of EF removal in the outpatient clinic between 10/06/22 and 03/02/23. Regional anaesthesia using ultrasound-guided blockade of peripheral nerves was administered using 1% lidocaine due to its rapid onset and short half-life. Patients were assessed for additional analgesia requirements and then were asked to evaluate their experience and perceived pain using the visual analogue scale (VAS). Results: Fifty patients were included in the study. The mean age was 46.8 years (range 21-85 years). About 54% of the patients were male patients ( Conclusion: We present the first description of outpatient EF removal using regional anaesthesia, with a prospective case series of 50 fully conscious patients from whom the EF was removed. This novel technique is likely to be cost-effective, reproducible, and safe. This technique reduces the burden of EF removal from an operating list and also improves the patient's experience when compared with other forms of conscious sedation. By eliminating the use of Entonox and methoxyflurane for sedation and analgesia, this technique also demonstrates a method of improving environmental sustainability. How to cite this article: Williams LM, Stamps G, Peak H,

Indexed as

External fixatorFrame removalLimb reconstructionRegional anaesthesiaRelative stabilityUltrasound-guided nerve blocks

Identifiers

PMID38033926
PMCPMC10682553
OpenAlexW4378908032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.