ReviewStrategies in trauma and limb reconstruction
Free Fibula Flap in Traumatic Femoral Bone Reconstruction: A 10-year Review.
Review in Strategies in trauma and limb reconstruction. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Single-stage Segmental Tibial Defect Reconstruction With Double-barrel Free Fibula Flap and Intramedullary Nail: An Innovative Technique Facilitating Early Load Bearing.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- Modified Masquelet Technique and Primary Tibial Metaphyseal Shortening for the Management of Proximal Tibial-infected Non-union in a Patient with Alcohol-induced Neuropathy: A Case Study.Strategies in trauma and limb reconstructionArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The loss of femoral bone substance represents a major therapeutic issue. When the loss of bone substance is extensive, or the local condition is unfavourable, there are few satisfactory solutions. In this study, we share our experience of large femoral bone reconstruction by free fibula flap. Materials and methods: A retrospective monocentric chart review (2007-2017) was performed for 26 patients after receiving a pure bone-free fibula flap operation. The times of consolidation and hypertrophy of the graft were analysed according to the fixation with a 2-year follow-up. Results: The time to consolidation was 8.7 months (range, 6-15) for double plates, 7.2 months (range, 5-11) for locked plates, 6 months (range, 5-7) for external fixators and plate blades and 8 months (range, 7-9) for intramedullary nails.Full weight-bearing was resumed at an average of 6.5 months (range, 5-10) postoperatively. It was authorised at 7 months (range, 5-10) for patients fixed by double plate, at 6.3 months (range, 5-9) for those fixed by a locked plate, at 5.5 months (range, 5-6) for those fixed by an external fixator or plate blade and at 7 months for those fixed by an intramedullary nail. Conclusion: Free fibula flap remains reliable in the face of a great loss of bone material after trauma, with high consolidation rates. The choice of fixation must be reasoned and should offer a compromise between stability, allowing consolidation and hypertrophy of the graft, and rigidity, exposing the risk of massive osteosynthesis dismantling. Other multicentric studies, including more patients, should be carried out to compare the techniques of fixation. How to cite this article: Viaud-Ambrosino S, Bargemon JBV, Kachouh N,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.