Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38033881›Full record

ArticleTobacco prevention & cessation2023

Exposure to e-cigarette advertisements and non-advertising content in relation to use behaviors and perceptions among US and Israeli adults.

Zongshuan Duan, Lorien C Abroms, Yuxian Cui, Yan Wang, Cassidy R LoParco, Hagai Levine, Yael Bar-Zeev, Amal Khayat, Carla J Berg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco prevention & cessation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Zongshuan DuanDepartment of Population Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, United States.
Lorien C AbromsDepartment of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, United States.
Yuxian CuiDepartment of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, United States.
Yan WangDepartment of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, United States.
Cassidy R LoParcoDepartment of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, United States.
Hagai LevineBraun School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem and Hadassah Medical Centre, Jerusalem, Israel.
Yael Bar-ZeevBraun School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem and Hadassah Medical Centre, Jerusalem, Israel.
Amal KhayatBraun School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem and Hadassah Medical Centre, Jerusalem, Israel.
Carla J BergDepartment of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAs e-cigarette marketing strategies diversify, it is important to examine exposure to and impact of e-cigarette advertisements and non-advertising content (e.g. on social media) via multiple media channels among adults in different regulatory contexts.

methodsUsing 2021 cross-sectional data among 2222 adults in the US (n=1128) and Israel (n=1094), multivariable regression examined past-month e-cigarette advertisement and non-advertising content exposure in relation to past-month e-cigarette use (logistic regression), as well as use intentions and risk perceptions (linear regressions), controlling for sociodemographics and tobacco use.

resultsOverall, 20.3% reported past-month e-cigarette use (15.5% US, 25.2% Israel), 46.1% any advertisement exposure (28.7% digital media, 25.2% traditional media, 16.8% retail settings), and 34.1% any non-advertising exposure (19.4% social media, 13.6% websites, 12.3% movie/television/theater, 5.8% radio/podcasts). Exposure to digital media advertisements (AOR=1.95; 95% CI: 1.42-2.66), traditional media advertisements (AOR=2.00; 95% CI=1.49-2.68), and social media non-advertising (AOR=1.72; 95% CI: 1.25-2.36) correlated with e-cigarette use. Exposure to traditional media advertisements (β=0.23; 95% CI: 0.08-0.38) and social media non-advertising (β=0.26; 95% CI: 0.09-0.43) correlated with use intentions. Exposure to digital media advertisements (β= -0.32; 95% CI: -0.57 - -0.08), retail setting advertisements (β= -0.30; 95% CI: -0.58 - -0.03), and radio/podcast non-advertising (β= -0.44; 95% CI: -0.84 - -0.03) correlated with lower perceived addictiveness. Radio/podcast non-advertising exposure (β= -0.50; 95% CI: -0.84 - -0.16) correlated with lower perceived harm. However, retail setting advertisement exposure was associated with e-cigarette non-use (AOR=0.61; 95% CI: 0.42-0.87), and traditional media advertisement (β=0.38; 95% CI: 0.15-0.61) and social media non-advertising exposure (β=0.40; 95% CI: 0.14-0.66) correlated with greater perceived addictiveness.

conclusionsE-cigarette-related promotional content exposure across media platforms impacts perceptions and use, thus warranting regulation.

Indexed as

advertisingelectronic cigarettesnon-advertising promotionperceptionssusceptibility

Identifiers

PMID38033881
PMCPMC10685321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.