Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38033801›Full record

ArticleACS central science2023

ChatGPT Research Group for Optimizing the Crystallinity of MOFs and COFs.

Zhiling Zheng, Oufan Zhang, Ha L Nguyen, Nakul Rampal, Ali H Alawadhi, Zichao Rong, Teresa Head-Gordon, Christian Borgs, Jennifer T Chayes, Omar M Yaghi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS central science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. AI-Based Retrosynthesis of Known and Unexplored Covalent Organic Framework Monomers.Chemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Porous Organic Polymers: From Molecular Design to Scalable Technologies.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zhiling ZhengDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6090-2258
Oufan ZhangDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, United States.
Ha L NguyenDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4977-925X
Nakul RampalDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, United States.
Ali H AlawadhiDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, United States.
Zichao RongDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9014-9540
Teresa Head-GordonDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0025-8987
Christian BorgsBakar Institute of Digital Materials for the Planet, College of Computing, Data Science, and Society, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, United States.
Jennifer T ChayesBakar Institute of Digital Materials for the Planet, College of Computing, Data Science, and Society, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, United States.
Omar M YaghiDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5611-3325

Funding

Calculating Ensembles of Discrete Dynamic Complexes and Condensed States of Intrinsically Disordered ProteinsR01GM127627 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI Teresa L. Head-Gordon · 2018 to 2026
$2.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM127627
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We leveraged the power of ChatGPT and Bayesian optimization in the development of a multi-AI-driven system, backed by seven large language model-based assistants and equipped with machine learning algorithms, that seamlessly orchestrates a multitude of research aspects in a chemistry laboratory (termed the ChatGPT Research Group). Our approach accelerated the discovery of optimal microwave synthesis conditions, enhancing the crystallinity of MOF-321, MOF-322, and COF-323 and achieving the desired porosity and water capacity. In this system, human researchers gained assistance from these diverse AI collaborators, each with a unique role within the laboratory environment, spanning strategy planning, literature search, coding, robotic operation, labware design, safety inspection, and data analysis. Such a comprehensive approach enables a single researcher working in concert with AI to achieve productivity levels analogous to those of an entire traditional scientific team. Furthermore, by reducing human biases in screening experimental conditions and deftly balancing the exploration and exploitation of synthesis parameters, our Bayesian search approach precisely zeroed in on optimal synthesis conditions from a pool of 6 million within a significantly shortened time scale. This work serves as a compelling proof of concept for an AI-driven revolution in the chemistry laboratory, painting a future where AI becomes an efficient collaborator, liberating us from routine tasks to focus on pushing the boundaries of innovation.

Identifiers

PMID38033801
PMCPMC10683477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.