ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2024
Five-year outcomes in carbon-ion radiotherapy for postoperative pelvic recurrence of rectal cancer: A prospective clinical trial (GUNMA 0801).
Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of particle therapy in the treatment of locally recurrent rectal cancer: a systematic review.Radiology and oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Review
- Article
- Lumbosacral Plexopathy After Carbon-ion Radiation Therapy for Postoperative Pelvic Recurrence of Rectal Cancer: Subanalysis of a Prospective Observational Study (GUNMA 0801).Advances in radiation oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Carbon-ion radiotherapy (C-ion RT) is associated with favorable clinical outcomes for the pelvic recurrence of rectal cancer. However, few long-term follow-up studies after C-ion RT have been conducted. Hence, we performed an updated analysis of a prospective clinical trial of C-ion RT for the postoperative pelvic recurrence of rectal cancer. Materials and methods: The study included 28 patients. Inclusion criteria were patients with confirmed pelvic recurrence of rectal cancer without distant metastasis; those who underwent curative resection of their primary disease and regional lymph nodes without gross or microscopic residual disease; and those who had radiographically measurable tumors. The total dose of C-ion RT for all the patients was 73.6 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) administered in 16 fractions. Results: The median follow-up duration in all patients and those who survived were 51.2 and 69.2 months, respectively. The follow-up rate at the time of analysis was 96.4%. The 5-year overall survival and local control rates were 50% and 83%, respectively. Four patients had local recurrence, and 17 died of rectal cancer. Regarding late toxicities, two patients developed grade 3 pelvic infection, and nine developed grade 2 peripheral neuropathy. Conclusion: Our updated analysis of a prospective clinical trial of C-ion RT for postoperative pelvic recurrence of rectal cancer confirmed its long-term efficacy and safety. These results suggest that C-ion RT may be a safe and effective treatment option for the postoperative pelvic recurrence of rectal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.