Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38033627›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in research metrics and analytics2023

Indigenous Peoples and research: self-determination in research governance.

Ibrahim Garba, Rogena Sterling, Rebecca Plevel, William Carson, Felina M Cordova-Marks, Jewel Cummins, Caleigh Curley, Dominique David-Chavez, Adam Fernandez, Danielle Hiraldo and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in research metrics and analytics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. A scoping review of Indigenous community-based research practices, guidelines, and ethical standards.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Measuring Wellness Through Indigenous Partnerships: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Ibrahim GarbaLands of the O'odham and Yaqui peoples, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Rogena SterlingLiving on the lands of Waikato-Tainui, Te Kotahi Research Institute, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Rebecca PlevelLands of the O'odham and Yaqui peoples, Native Nations Institute, Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
William CarsonLands of the O'odham and Yaqui peoples, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Felina M Cordova-MarksLands of the O'odham and Yaqui peoples, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Jewel CumminsLands of the O'odham and Yaqui peoples, Native Nations Institute, Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Caleigh CurleyLands of the O'odham and Yaqui peoples, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Dominique David-ChavezNunt'zi (Ute), Hinono'eino' (Arapaho), and Tsitsistas (Cheyenne) homelands, Department of Forest and Rangeland Stewardship, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States.
Adam FernandezLands of the O'odham and Yaqui peoples, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Danielle HiraldoAncestral homeland of Eastern Siouan-speaking Indigenous peoples (Yesàh, "The People"), American Indian Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Vanessa HiratsukaDena'ina Ełnena, Center for Human Development, College of Health, University of Alaska Anchorage, Anchorage, AK, United States.
Maui HudsonLiving on the lands of Waikato-Tainui, Te Kotahi Research Institute, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Mary Beth JägerLands of the O'odham and Yaqui peoples, Native Nations Institute, Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Lydia L JenningsLands of the O'odham and Yaqui peoples, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Andrew MartinezLands of the O'odham and Yaqui peoples, Native Nations Institute, Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Joseph YrachetaLands of the Oceti Sakowin (Seven council fires of the Lakota/Nakoda/Dakota), Native BioData Consortium, Eagle Butte, SD, United States.
Nanibaa' A GarrisonTraditional, ancestral and unceded territory of the Gabrielino/Tongva peoples, Institute for Society and Genetics, College of Letters and Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Stephanie Russo CarrollLands of the O'odham and Yaqui peoples, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.

Funding

UA Student Development: Data Warriors Fellowship ProgramS06GM142123 · NIGMS · INTER TRIBAL COUNCIL OF ARIZONA, INC. · PI DADGAR, MARIA, SOLOMON, TESHIA G. ARAMBULA · 2021 to 2024
$5.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS S06 GM142123
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Indigenous Peoples are reimagining their relationship with research and researchers through greater self-determination and involvement in research governance. The emerging discourse around Indigenous Data Sovereignty has provoked discussions about decolonizing data practices and highlighted the importance of Indigenous Data Governance to support Indigenous decision-making and control of data. Given that much data are generated from research, Indigenous research governance and Indigenous Data Governance overlap. In this paper, we broaden the concept of Indigenous Data Sovereignty by using the CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance to discuss how research legislation and policy adopted by Indigenous Peoples in the US set expectations around recognizing sovereign relationships, acknowledging rights and interests in data, and enabling Indigenous Peoples' participation in research governance.

Indexed as

CARE Principlesdata governanceData SovereigntyIndigenousresearch governanceresearch practiceself-determination

Identifiers

PMID38033627
PMCPMC10685893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.